Canada Dumps Missile Shield | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.21.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.22.25

Airborne-FltTraining-10.23.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Thu, Feb 24, 2005

Canada Dumps Missile Shield

US: "We Will Deploy"

Canada Thursday formally pulled out of the US Missile Shield program, with Prime Minister Paul Martin insisting his country will maintain positive control over its airspace.

“After careful consideration of the issue, we have decided that Canada will not participate in the US ballistic missile defence system,” Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre Pettigrew said in the House of Commons Thursday.

The decision from Ottawa seemed to put an instant strain on cross-border relations.

“We will deploy. We will defend North America,” said US ambassador Paul Cellucci. “We simply cannot understand why Canada would in effect give up its sovereignty -– its seat at the table -– to decide what to do about a missile that might be coming towards Canada.” He was quoted by the Canadian Press.

From Washington's point of view, the sudden announcement was seen as a confusing signal, coming just days after Canada's newly-appointed ambassador to the US indicated his country was already participating in the Missile Shield program. He indicated the NORAD agreement between the two countries had been amended in such a way that Canada was already on board with the program. Frank McKenna's remarks came at almost the same time Prime Minister Martin's office made a call to Washington, announcing his decision not to participate in the anti-missile effort.

Then, twice this week, Canadian Defense Minister Bill Graham insisted nothing had changed and no decision had been made.

“The official Canadian position was conveyed by Foreign Minister Pettigrew to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at our meetings in Brussels,” Martin told reporters, as quoted by CP. “Since then, I have discussed it with ambassador Cellucci, Mr. Graham has discussed it with [Deputy Defence Secretary Paul] Wolfowitz in the United States and I would expect to be discussing it again, with President Bush, hopefully today or in the very near future.”

FMI: http://canada.gc.ca/main_e.html

Advertisement

More News

Airborne-Flight Training 10.23.25: PanAm Back?, Spirit Cuts, Affordable Expo

Also: USAF Pilots, Advanced Aircrew Academy, ATC Hiring, Hop-A-Jet Sues Pan American is attempting a comeback. Aviation merchant bank AVi8 Air Capital, alongside Pan American Globa>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 10.23.25: PanAm Back?, Spirit Cuts, Affordable Expo

Also: USAF Pilots, Advanced Aircrew Academy, ATC Hiring, Hop-A-Jet Sues Pan American is attempting a comeback. Aviation merchant bank AVi8 Air Capital, alongside Pan American Globa>[...]

Airborne 10.22.25: Rez Takes Plane, DJI v US Drone Ban, HK 747 Cargo Accident

Also: DHS Under Fire, Air New Zealand, ALPA Praises Bipartisan Bill, Spirit Budget Cuts The Minnesota Pilots Association has issued an advisory regarding overflights of the Red Lak>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Portrait of the U.S. Transportation Safety Institute

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Beauty Amongst Ghastly Federal Agencies Founded in 1971 and based in Oklahoma City, the Transportation Safety Institute (TSI) is a subsidiary of the U.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.21.25): Flight Check

Flight Check A call sign prefix used by FAA aircraft engaged in flight inspection/certification of navigational aids and flight procedures. The word “recorded” may be a>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC