NTSB Recommends 'Seat Shockers' In Commercial Airliners | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Thu, Apr 01, 2010

NTSB Recommends 'Seat Shockers' In Commercial Airliners

Wants To Be Sure Pilots Are Paying Attention, Not Distracted

ANN April 1st Special Edition: The NTSB has issued a recommendation to the FAA that it require all commercial airliners be equipped with "seat shockers" for the pilot and co-pilot to avoid another "distracted pilot" incident.

After Northwest Flight 188 overflew its destination by 150 miles last October, the flight crew said they were "distracted" by a discussion of airline policy while looking at their laptop computers. NTSB Chairman Deborah Hersman said the FAA should require that all commercial airliners be equipped with a device slaved to the airplane's FMS that will give pilots a slight, but noticeable jolt through the seat as they approach their destination.

"We're not sure how that's supposed to be done, but we're sure it will increase safety," Hersman said. She said pilots could avoid the jolt by pressing a button on the instrument panel every half hour during flight.

The board also recommended that ATC should have the ability to activate the system for any aircraft that they are unable to contact for an extended period of time. "It should work through the transponder code," Hersman (pictured) said. "If the pilots don't respond to the radio, then a controller should be able to wake them up."

Pilots unions immediately reacted to the recommendation by saying the NTSB had no right to impugn their professionalism. "Our pilots don't deserve a kick in the pants no matter what the circumstances," said a spokesperson for one union not authorized to speak to the media. While questioning the logistics of such a system, NATCA members privately said (with a bit of a gleam in their eye) they would welcome the ability to get a pilot's attention.

Both Boeing and Airbus said such a system could add tens of thousands to dollars to the cost of new airplanes, and retrofits would be difficult. And, of course, the system would have to be shut off during takeoff and landing to prevent interference with the airplane's navigation equipment.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Up Close And Personal - The Aeroshell Aerobatic Team at Oshkosh

From 2014 (YouTube Version): One Of The Airshow World's Pre-Eminent Formation Teams Chats About The State Of The Industry At EAA AirVenture 2014, ANN News Editor Tom Patton gets th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.13.25): Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN)

Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) An ultra-high frequency electronic rho-theta air navigation aid which provides suitably equipped aircraft a continuous indication of bearing and dis>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.13.25)

Aero Linx: Doobert Hi, we're Chris & Rachael Roy, founders and owners of Doobert. Chris is a technology guy in his “day” job and used his experience to create Doobe>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Pitts S2

The Airplane Was Spinning In A Nose-Down Attitude Before It Impacted Terrain On June 20, 2025, at 0900 eastern daylight time, a Pitts Aerobatics S-2B, N79AV, was destroyed when it >[...]

Airborne 07.09.25: B-17 Sentimental Journey, Airport Scandal, NORAD Intercepts

Also: United Elite Sues, Newark ATC Transitions, Discovery Moves?, Textron @ KOSH The Commemorative Air Force Airbase Arizona is taking its “Flying Legends of Victory Tour&rd>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC