Mon, Oct 20, 2014
Says Law Firm Has No Standing To Request Investigation Materials
The NTSB has filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the Wolk Law Firm in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania seeking material related to an accident which occurred in May.

According to the NTSB's preliminary report on the accident, the FDR data from the Gulfstream G IV which was involved revealed the elevator control surface position during the taxi and takeoff was consistent with its position if the airplane's gust lock was engaged. However, the gust lock handle, located on the right side of the control pedestal, was found in the forward (OFF) position, and the elevator gust lock latch was found not engaged.
But this case is not entirely about the actual details of the accident. The Legal Intelligencer reports that the Wolk Law Firm had filed a Freedom of Information request seeking access to the NTSB's documentation of the case. The NTSB has not provided the requested materials, and the law firm accused the board of obstruction of justice.
The NTSB argued in asking for the dismissal that the U.S. has "sovereign immunity for such claims," and that there is no private cause of action for federal obstruction of justice.
The NTSB also says that the law firm has not used every administrative means through the FOIA to obtain the material before going to court.
The law firm and its clients say that the NTSB gives an advantage to aircraft manufacturers over accident victims when it reviews cases. In their complaint, the plaintiffs said that the board "continues to this day to obstruct, withhold and/or destroy evidence of airplane crashes, which evidence includes photographs, notes, manuals and other evidence and only allows crash victims access to its 'Public Docket,' which contains only those photographs, notes, manuals and other evidence selected by the NTSB with the sole input of the manufacturer party participants who are putative defendants in lawsuits arising from the crash."
The NTSB said in its motion to dismiss filed October 10th that while the FOIA does provide individuals with a right to obtain certain information, "plaintiffs do not have a constitutionally protected property or liberty interest in obtaining the requested information regarding the aircraft crashes."
More News
He Attempted To Restart The Engine Three Times. On The Third Restart Attempt, He Noticed That Flames Were Coming Out From The Right Wing Near The Fuel Cap Analysis: The pilot repor>[...]
Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]
From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Leading Air Show Performers Give Their Best Advice for Newcomers On December 6th through December 9th, the Paris Las Vegas Hotel hosted over 1,500 air >[...]
Aero Linx: NASA ASRS ASRS captures confidential reports, analyzes the resulting aviation safety data, and disseminates vital information to the aviation community. The ASRS is an i>[...]
“For our inaugural Pylon Racing Seminar in Roswell, we were thrilled to certify 60 pilots across our six closed-course pylon race classes. Not only did this year’s PRS >[...]