Flight Attendants Fight Congressional Attempts to Make Security
Training Voluntary
[If it's
voluntary, passengers will pay for it; if it's mandatory, taxpayers
will pay for it. If it's voluntary, an airline could use it as
a competitve advantage: "Why would you fly those unsafe airlines,
when Treetop Air Service really cares?" The problem our rulers see
is, PAX probably wouldn't agree to the extra expense, sensing as
they do that current level of security is sufficient, and
expensive enough. Therefore, if it's gonna happen, it'll have to be
forced on us --ed.]
Patricia Friend, International President of the Association
of Flight Attendants, AFL-CIO sent the following letter on February
7 to conferees on the Omnibus Appropriations bill to illuminate
stealth attempts to weaken vital flight attendant security training
provisions and put millions of American lives at risk of another
terrorist attack on the airline industry.
Dear Conferee:
On behalf of
the 50,000 members of the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA),
AFL-CIO, I strongly urge you to oppose all efforts to include
provisions in the 2003 Omnibus Appropriations legislation that
would make flight attendant security training voluntary. Please
defeat any efforts in the Conference Committee to water down our
and Congress' successful efforts to protect American citizens from
another catastrophic terrorist attack on our aviation system.
On September 11th, flight attendants were the first victims of
the heinous terrorist attacks. The world and air travel have
changed dramatically since that tragic day.
As we are on the verge of war with Saddam
Hussein's brutal regime, we know that our country will be at great
risk from yet another horrible attack and our aviation system is
still a primary target of terrorists' horrible goals. And now
today, the Homeland Security Department has increased our threat
awareness to code orange, the second highest status. Now more than
ever it's crucial that all flight attendants receive consistent and
mandatory security training in order to defend themselves, the
passengers and the aircraft from yet another attack. With pilots
armed and barricaded behind cockpit doors, flight attendants are
the last line of defense in the aircraft cabin. It is a tragic
mistake to ignore this reality and to make vital security training
voluntary. If such training is voluntary, it will leave yet another
loophole in our aviation security system that will allow any
determined terrorist to wreak havoc and bloodshed on our country
yet again.
All aircraft cabin crew, pilots and air marshals must be aware
of their proper roles and be adequately trained should another
hijacking attempt occur. To make this training voluntary only
increases the likelihood that another attack will be successful in
killing many Americans in an aircraft cabin, even without reaching
the cockpit door. Remember, the goal of a terrorist is to strike
fear into the hearts of all Americans and to prevent them from
going about their daily routine. An aircraft that safely lands with
everyone in the cabin dead from a terrorist's hands will no doubt
achieve that goal.
All other flight attendant training to protect the
lives of passengers is mandatory. We can't opt out of learning how
to fight in-flight fires, first aid training or evacuation
procedures, so why make training that could potentially save
thousands of human lives voluntary? To claim that this training is
too expensive and burdensome is equivalent to putting a dollar
amount on an innocent human life. The basic function of government
is to protect its citizens from attack and harm. To believe the
rhetoric and uncaring pleas of those who claim it is too expensive
to train all flight crew in the methods and means to protect
thousands of innocent lives is to neglect the government's solemn
duty to protect all Americans from attack, both foreign and
domestic.
The U.S. Congress did the right thing in requiring flight
attendant security training. To stealthily change those provisions
now in the omnibus appropriations bill is a cowardly, greedy move
that will place thousands upon thousands of American lives at risk.
Many of us asked ourselves after September 11th, what could we have
done differently to prevent such a horrible attack? Congress
answered by closing many of the security loopholes in the aviation
system, including mandating flight attendant security training. If
this vital training is made voluntary, I believe we will be asking
ourselves the same questions again and regretting the fact we did
not take all the necessary steps to protect ourselves.
Again, please strongly oppose all efforts to make flight
attendant security training voluntary.
Respectfully,
Patricia A. Friend
International President