Boeing Doubts USAF Will Seek New Bids For CSAR-X | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Thu, Mar 15, 2007

Boeing Doubts USAF Will Seek New Bids For CSAR-X

May Reevaluate Operating Costs Instead

Despite strong recommendations from the Government Accounting Office to the contrary, representatives at Boeing say they doubt the US Air Force will reopen competition for the $15 billion CSAR-X contract award for a new search-and-rescue helicopter.

As Aero-News reported, last month the GAO ruled on protests by Lockheed Martin and Sikorsky, and recommended the USAF reopen bidding on the CSAR-X contract awarded to Boeing in November 2006. Last week, Air Force officials replied, essentially, the USAF doesn't have to comply with the GAO suggested -- as the agency's ruling is nonbinding, and carries little real legislative weight.

Though of course Boeing doesn't want to see its contract slip away, this week the American aerospace manufacturer took something of a middle-of-the-road position on the matter, opining to Bloomberg the Air Force will probably opt to review operating and support costs figures for the three entrants in the competition.

Rick Lemaster, Boeing program manager for its winning CSAR-X entry, the HH-47, said that was the main point of the GAO's recommendations, anyway.

"We expect the Air Force will address the specific issue identified by GAO and not permit other bidders to set an agenda for an entirely new competition that might be in their interests but not in the best interests of the service," Lemaster said.  "Enhancing the Air Force's ability to save the lives of our soldiers and airmen sooner rather than later should be the most important consideration."

Lockheed had offered its US101(center), jointly produced by Bell and a variant of the helo named as the new Marine One presidential transport in 2005. Sikorsky pitched its S-92-based HH-92 (bottom) in the competition to replace the Air Force's existing fleet of Sikorsky-built HH-60 Pave Hawks.

FMI: www.af.mil, www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Up Close And Personal - The Aeroshell Aerobatic Team at Oshkosh

From 2014 (YouTube Version): One Of The Airshow World's Pre-Eminent Formation Teams Chats About The State Of The Industry At EAA AirVenture 2014, ANN News Editor Tom Patton gets th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.13.25): Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN)

Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) An ultra-high frequency electronic rho-theta air navigation aid which provides suitably equipped aircraft a continuous indication of bearing and dis>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.13.25)

Aero Linx: Doobert Hi, we're Chris & Rachael Roy, founders and owners of Doobert. Chris is a technology guy in his “day” job and used his experience to create Doobe>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Pitts S2

The Airplane Was Spinning In A Nose-Down Attitude Before It Impacted Terrain On June 20, 2025, at 0900 eastern daylight time, a Pitts Aerobatics S-2B, N79AV, was destroyed when it >[...]

Airborne 07.09.25: B-17 Sentimental Journey, Airport Scandal, NORAD Intercepts

Also: United Elite Sues, Newark ATC Transitions, Discovery Moves?, Textron @ KOSH The Commemorative Air Force Airbase Arizona is taking its “Flying Legends of Victory Tour&rd>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC