NASA Report Says Boeing Fixes Ineffective | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Wed, Aug 14, 2024

NASA Report Says Boeing Fixes Ineffective

Company Has Not Taken Action To Fix Recurring Issues

A report from NASA paints Boeing failing to take any action to remedy deficiencies the agency sees in how Boeing is handling the problems with its Starliner crew vehicle, currently docked with the International Space Station but unable to return to Earth.

The space agency’s report was issued by its internal Office of the Inspector General (OIG), which goes into detail with problems it saw with Boeing’s processes for quality control and issue resolution. The report contains statements that do not bode well for the aerospace manufacturer. Examples include, 'Boeing's process to address deficiencies to date has been ineffective.' 'The company has generally been nonresponsive in taking corrective actions when the same quality control issues reoccur.' Another example involves poor welding on a liquid oxygen fuel tank dome.

NASA brought in the Pentagon’s Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) to assist with its investigation. DCMA conducted its own inspections and came up with a total of about 71 items that it required Corrective Action Requests (CARs) that were Level I and II. DCMA says Level I are considered the least serious and Level IV the most serious. The NASA OIG report stated, “According to DCMA officials, this is a high number of CARs for a space flight system at this stage in development and reflects a recurring and degraded state of product quality control.” The OIG report recommended, among other things, that NASA “Institute financial penalties for Boeing’s noncompliance with quality control standards,” but the agency declined to follow that recommendation.

FMI: www.nasa.gov/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.25): Circle To Runway (Runway Number)

Circle To Runway (Runway Number) Used by ATC to inform the pilot that he/she must circle to land because the runway in use is other than the runway aligned with the instrument appr>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.05.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: De Havilland DHC-1

At Altitude Of About 250-300 Ft Agl, The Airplane Experienced A Total Loss Of Engine Power On November 6, 2024, at 1600 central standard time, a De Havilland DHC-1, N420TD, was inv>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Boeing Dreamliner -- Historic First Flight Coverage

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Three Hour Flight Was 'Flawless' -- At Least, Until Mother Nature Intervened For anyone who loves the aviation business, this was a VERY good day. Afte>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.06.25: AF Uncrewed Fighters, Drones v Planes, Joby Crew Test

Also: AMA Names Tyler Dobbs, More Falcon 9 Ops, Firefly Launch Unsuccessful, Autonomous F-16s The Air Force has begun ground testing a future uncrewed jet design in a milestone tow>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC