Foreigners Hit Jackpot in US Court: Garuda Crash Settles | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Sep 25, 2003

Foreigners Hit Jackpot in US Court: Garuda Crash Settles

You may remember it, almost six years ago (September 26, 1997): Flight 152, a Garuda Indonesia Airlines A300, went through a horrible crash, cartwheeling down a mountainside in Sumatra, Indonesia. All 234 aboard, including two Americans, died.

Chicago's Nolan Law Group figured out a way to have the trial in the US, despite there having been just two Americans aboard the foreign-made plane, flown by foreigners for a foreign airline, that crashed in a foreign country. The money's just too good, from the juries and courts in the USA...

The settlement for 28 victims' families, reached Tuesday, minutes before trial, does not cover the two Americans' deaths.

Sundstrand (now part of Honeywell) is being sued jointly and severally, for everything the lawyers can think of. Sundstrand manufactured the early-1980s-design Mk II GPWS (ground proximity warning system); and plaintiffs claim that some malfunction, or the design itself, caused the crash. In fact, reports say, lawyers say the crash would have been totally avoidable, had the system worked as designed. The more-common theory of the crash (the official investigation hasn't released conclusions; but those well-researched reports are excluded from American court proceedings, as they tend to deflate lawyers' wallets) is that smoke from extensive forest fires obscured visibility, and that some ATC communications with the crew were misunderstood.

The flight left Jakarta, and was headed for Medan. the crash was about eighteen miles short of the destination airport, which had been closed on and off in the preceding days, due to that fire activity.

The confusion in the cockpit was exacerbated by confusion on the ground. 'Left' and 'right' were not clear -- directions to turn one way, were followed by confirmations of turns in the other direction. But, of course, it was all Sundstrand's fault.

FMI: www.honeywell.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.04.25): Cooperative Surveillance

Cooperative Surveillance Any surveillance system, such as secondary surveillance radar (SSR), wide-area multilateration (WAM), or ADS-B, that is dependent upon the presence of cert>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.04.25)

Aero Linx: OX5 Aviation Pioneers Incorporated in 1955 as a Pa 501 (c)(3) Not for Profit Corporation, the OX5 Aviation Pioneers is dedicated to bringing before the public the accomp>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Extra Flugzeugproduktions EA 300/SC

The Pilot Appeared To Regain Control After Six Rotations And Attempted To “Fly Out” Inverted But Had Insufficient Altitude On November 8, 2025, at 1038 eastern standard>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Bally Bomber - The All Time Ultimate Warbird Replica?

From 2018 (YouTube Edition): Aero-News Talks With The Airplane's Builder One of the many unique airplanes at AirVenture 2018 was a 1/3-scale B-17 bomber built by Jack Bally, who ta>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.05.25)

Aero Linx: Society of U.S. Army Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFS) The Society of US Army Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFS) serves to advance the science and art of Aerospace Medicine and its allie>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC