Federal Judge Blames FAA For 2001 Mishap | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.19.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.21.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.23.25

Wed, Nov 17, 2004

Federal Judge Blames FAA For 2001 Mishap

PA-32 Went Down In Heavy Fog Near JAX; All Four On Board Were Lost


A federal judge in Jacksonville (FL) ruled Tuesday that the FAA was partly responsible for the crash of a Piper PA-31 Cherokee in 2001. All four people on board were killed.

The aircraft, which had departed Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport, went down in heavy fog after the pilot, lawyer Don Weidner, executed a missed approach. The Cherokee (file photo of type, below) crashed in woods so thick that it took recovery teams 16 hours to reach the wreckage

.

Weidner, fellow attorney Thomas Bowden, and their friends, Jim and Adrienne Abrisch, were killed in the accident.

At the end of a non-jury trial on Tuesday, federal judge Timothy Corrigan ruled that the FAA was 65-percent responsible for the accident because controllers failed to give Weidner current weather information. The judge assessed 35-percent of the blame on Weidner himself for failing to consider other options after executing missed approaches at both his destination, St. Augustine, and his alternate, Craig Airport in Jacksonville.

The NTSB found that the accident was probably caused by pilot error and spatial disorientation. Lawyers for the FAA contended Weidner was adversely affected by the over-the-counter cold medicine he was taking.

Judge Corrigan, however, said that the temporary tower, where JAX controllers were operating at the time, was improperly set up. He also ruled that there had been a communications failure forcing controllers to use their Nextel radios instead of the primary communications system.

The FAA refused comment on the ruling.

No damages were awarded at Tuesday's trial. A separate federal court proceeding will determine whether such damages are appropriate and if so, how much.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.25): Terminal Radar Service Area

Terminal Radar Service Area Airspace surrounding designated airports wherein ATC provides radar vectoring, sequencing, and separation on a full-time basis for all IFR and participa>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.25): Very High Frequency (VHF)

Very High Frequency (VHF) The frequency band between 30 and 300 MHz. Portions of this band, 108 to 118 MHz, are used for certain NAVAIDs; 118 to 136 MHz are used for civil air/grou>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.30.25)

“From approximately November 2021 through January 2022, Britton-Harr, acting on behalf of AeroVanti, entered into lease-purchase agreements for five Piaggio-manufactured airc>[...]

Airborne 05.23.25: Global 8000, Qatar B747 Accepted, Aviation Merit Badge

Also: Virtual FLRAA Prototype, IFR-Capable Autonomous A/C, NS-32 Crew, Golden Dome Missile Defense Bombardier announced that the first production Global 8000 successfully completed>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.30.25)

Aero Linx: The 1-26 Association (Schweizer) The Association’s goal is to foster the helpfulness, the camaraderie, and the opportunity for head-to-head competition that is fou>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC