Potomac Airfield Responds To Shock Closure | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.14.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.15.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.16.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.17.24

Thu, Nov 03, 2005

Potomac Airfield Responds To Shock Closure

Manager David Wartofsky Fires Back At TSA

Editor's Note: Yesterday, November 1st, the TSA slammed Potomac Airfield closed, with a brief and statement which we provided without further comment. Here is Potomac Airfield's response by manager David Wartofsky (below), which we'll run in the same manner.

We do not know the cause of this closure at this time. (The TSA statement did not make it clear). We are investigating and will comment soon. Take it away, David Wartofsky:


TSA WALKING AWAY FROM IMPROVED AIRSPACE SECURITY BY CLOSING POTOMAC AIRFIELD IN MARYLAND

Airspace security in the national capital area is provided by multiple agencies.  Rather than address the more significant long-standing problems, unfortunately in this case, TSA has chosen the least effective route.

To improve security overhead, instead of more effectively dealing with real airspace issues, which are addressed through operational security measures, TSA has chosen to lock a few aircraft on the ground; even more remarkably, aircraft only operated by pilots already cleared by TSA, The United States Secret Service, and other agencies.

Meanwhile TSA allows pilots having less secure procedures to continue to operate.

While Potomac Airfield has continually improved security, through improving plans approved by TSA, and by incorporating security measures already in place for other operators in the National Capital Area, TSA has withdrawn its approval for reasons that are not clear.

Potomac Airfield security plans have been developed in consultation with all relevant agencies responsible to enhance airspace security, including United States Secret Service, Customs, DOD, FAA, and others, yet TSA for some reason feels this is inadequate.

By TSA removing its approval, TSA has chosen to not support enhanced security.

In review of information provided by TSA and other agencies, no agency has identified any physical threat; particularly from the pilots already approved by TSA, USSS and others, who operate from the Potomac Airfield.

The procedures developed by Potomac Airfield, to more effectively screen and eliminate any real potential threat, go unnoticed by TSA.

TSA's current action is further evidence that TSA, in this instance, does not understand enhancing airspace security through more effective operational procedures.

TSA also does not understand the impact to legitimate private-sector users; shown by their similar efforts to 're-open' DCA to general aviation, as recently reported by the press.

Regardless, TSA continues to allow pilots not having assured in-cockpit control to operate, while grounding those pilots with the most effective operational security protocols.

Potomac understands that Congressional inquiries are under way considering TSA's handling of this particular matter.

Potomac also plans to request clarification from the Executive office about their sincerity in decisions post 911, to re-open national security airspace to legitimate private sector users.

Potomac understands that TSA's statutory authority is to coordinate with other government agencies.

It is not clear that TSA coordinated with any Executive agencies in this action.

FMI: www.potomac-airfield.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.17.24): Very High Frequency

Very High Frequency The frequency band between 30 and 300 MHz. Portions of this band, 108 to 118 MHz, are used for certain NAVAIDs; 118 to 136 MHz are used for civil air/ground voi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.17.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Suppliers Association Established February 25, 1993, the Aviation Suppliers Association (ASA), based in Washington, D.C., is a not-for-profit association, repre>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: ANN Visits Wings Over The Rockies Exploration Of Flight

From 2021 (YouTube Version): Colorado Campus Offers aVariety Of Aerospace Entertainment And Education Wings over the Rockies Exploration of Flight is the second location for the Wi>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.16.24: PRA Runway, Wag-Aero Sold, Young Eagles

Also: Paramotor Champ's, Electric Ultralight, ICON BK Update, Burt Rutan at Oshkosh! The Popular Rotorcraft Association is reaching out for help in rebuilding their private runway >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC