AOPA To FAA: Change AC To Cover Older Planes | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jul 06, 2005

AOPA To FAA: Change AC To Cover Older Planes

Proposed Guideline Would Cover More Than Just Part 23 Aircraft

The AOPA wants the FAA to revise a proposed advisory circular (AC) to clarify that it can be applied to all older general aviation aircraft.

The new AC would set guidelines for allowing aircraft to continue flying with known structural cracks. The AC would publicize a long-existing FAA policy that deems an aircraft is still airworthy if the crack is not in the primary structure and the airframe can still withstand the ultimate design load.

"The FAA left out the majority of older GA aircraft from this guidance document," said Luis Gutierrez, AOPA director of regulatory and certification policy. "As drafted, it only applies to Part 23-certificated aircraft. But most aircraft flying today were certificated under the old CAR 3 standards.

"It's important that the policy be applied uniformly and predictably to all aircraft in order to keep them flying safely and affordably," Gutierrez said.

AOPA also expressed concern that the proposed AC excludes previously acceptable methods used to substantiate an airplane's ability to sustain ultimate load with cracks in non-critical structure. "The removal of those options from the AC would eliminate viable alternative testing methods with demonstrated success in determining the continued safety of the airframe," said Gutierrez.

Most older aircraft have developed cracks in some structures because of the natural aging process. Although certification authorities in some other countries will ground aircraft with any cracks, the United States has taken the more reasonable position of determining if the crack poses any threat to safety

FMI: www.aopa.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.03.25)

Aero Linx: American Aviation Historical Society AAHS is dedicated to the preservation and dissemination of the rich heritage of American aviation. Our purpose is to collect, preser>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.03.25): CrewMember (UAS)

CrewMember (UAS) A person assigned to perform an operational duty. A UAS crewmember includes the remote pilot in command, the person manipulating the controls, and visual observers>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Maule M-7-235A

Immediately After The Right Main Tire Contacted The Runway Surface, The Right Main Landing Gear Failed On October 31, 2025, at about 1227 Pacific daylight time, a Maule M-7-235A, N>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.04.25)

"On December 3, 2025, at approximately 10:45 a.m., a Thunderbird pilot ejected safely from a F-16C Fighting Falcon aircraft during a training mission over controlled airspace in Ca>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC