AEA: FAA Extends Comment Period for Part 145 Rewrite | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.03.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.04.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.05.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Mon, Aug 20, 2012

AEA: FAA Extends Comment Period for Part 145 Rewrite

Troubling NPRM Gets More Time To Develop Consensus--At The Last Minute

The folks at AEA tell us that on Friday, Aug. 17, the FAA announced an extension of the comment period for its notice of proposed rulemaking that was published on May 21, which is a proposed rewrite of Part 145. The original deadline for the comment period was set for Aug. 20, but it has now been extended until Nov. 19.

Recently, the Aircraft Electronics Association joined with other associations in Washington, D.C., to put forward a unified voice and requested an extension to this critical and wide-ranging proposal regarding how AEA members operate their repair station businesses. The extension was granted and announced in the Federal Register.

To help understand the scope of the Federal Aviation Administration's proposed significant and potentially damaging rewrite of Part 145, the AEA has published a comparative analysis of the proposed changes to current regulatory language.

(Click here to read the AEA's Comparative Analysis)

The yellow highlighted portions of the comparative analysis indicate the distinct differences between the proposed changes and current regulatory language.

The FAA has proposed a significant rewrite of the repair station regulations without a clear layout of who may accomplish what maintenance. The proposal eliminates many of the currently utilized opportunities for mobile maintenance operations. In addition, it appears that a current radio-rated repair station with a limited airframe rating would, under this proposal, need to hold two additional airframe ratings just to retain the opportunities that it currently has. Most disappointing of all is the proposal to reverse many of the hard-fought provisions that were gained in previous rulemaking efforts.

FMI: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-05-21/pdf/2012-11984.pdf

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.05.24: Yakstars Midair, Electra eSTOL Test, Space Tour No-Go

Also: Aerox 'Cylinder Sentinel', Annual TBM Reunion, Hubble Pause, Utah AAM A combined Spanish-Portuguese aerobatic demo team suffered a fatality at the Beja AirShow, when one of t>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Aviation Prop Masters--Hartzell Composite Props for the KingAir

From 2019 (YouTube Version): Hartzell Propeller Secures STC For King Air Propellers Hartzell Propeller has secured an FAA Type Certificate for a new five-blade carbon fiber propell>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.03.24)

"Starship’s third flight test made tremendous strides towards a future of rapidly reliable reusable rockets. The test completed several exciting firsts, including the first S>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.03.24)

Aero Linx: Utah Back Country Pilots Association (UBCP) We hope to promote flying in Utah, and we welcome you to our state. We recognize the inherent hazards and risk involved in ba>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.03.24):Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC