A4A Denounces CBP Offset In Highway Funding Bill | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.10.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.12.24 Airborne-FltTraining-06.13.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.14.24

Fri, Dec 04, 2015

A4A Denounces CBP Offset In Highway Funding Bill

NATA Praises Pompeo Call For GAO Analysis Of The Tax

A congressional plan to increase aviation security taxes and use the proceeds to offset the cost of surface transportation projects has drawn a strong rebuke for Airlines for America (A4A), a major airline industry trade organization.

"We support infrastructure improvement, and applaud the bipartisan effort to reach agreement on a highway bill," the association said in a statement released to the media. "However, airline customers are already overtaxed, and this agreement will further drive up the cost of travel for the 2 million passengers who fly on U.S. airlines every day. It is unfortunate that, once again, Congress is placing the burden to fund highway spending on the backs of the flying public."

The bill includes a provision supported by NATA directing the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct a study of diversions of non-commercial jet fuel tax revenues to the Highway Trust Fund.

"NATA applauds Representative Pompeo (R-KS) for recognizing the opportunity presented by the legislation and adding this important provision during House floor debate. We also thank House Transportation Committee Chairman Shuster (R-PA) and Ranking Member DeFazio (D-OR) for accepting the amendment, as well as House General Aviation Caucus Co-Chair, Representative Sam Graves (R-MO), for keeping track of it during this legislation’s long, arduous conference negotiations," the organization said in a statement. "Finally, it certainly helped to have long-time general aviation supporter and fellow pilot, Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK), as that chamber’s lead negotiator.

"NATA has long questioned the need for the 2005 diversion provision and views it as a bureaucratic roadblock draining the Airport and Airway Trust Fund of revenues needed for airport improvements and the deployment of a more modern air traffic control system. We are confident that an investigation by the GAO, the nonpartisan investigative arm of Congress, will bolster the case for the provision’s ultimate repeal.”

(Source: A4A, NATA news releases)

FMI: www.airlines.org, www.nata.aero

Advertisement

More News

ANNouncement: Now Accepting Applications For Oshkosh 2024 Stringers!!!

An Amazing Experience Awaits The Chosen Few... Oshkosh, to us, seems the perfect place to get started on watching aviation recover the past couple of years... and so ANN is putting>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.13.24)

“NBAA has a tremendous responsibility to the business aviation industry, and we are constantly collaborating with them. Our flight departments, professionals and aircraft own>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.13.24): Dead Reckoning

Dead Reckoning Dead reckoning, as applied to flying, is the navigation of an airplane solely by means of computations based on airspeed, course, heading, wind direction, and speed,>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.13.24)

Aero Linx: Vertical Aviation Safety Team (VAST) We are a public–private initiative to enhance worldwide flight operations safety in all segments of the vertical flight indust>[...]

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC