Wed, Apr 09, 2014
Says Business Aircraft Cabin Is A Much Different Environment Than A Crowded Airliner
In response to a DOT advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM), NBAA said a proposed ban on in-flight voice communications through passenger mobile wireless devices would strip business aviation users of a key advantage when traveling onboard private, secure aircraft.

"There are considerable benefits to allowing customers the freedom to make an in-flight voice call if they deem it necessary and are willing to pay any applicable service fees," NBAA noted in comments submitted on March 26. "This is particularly the case for charter passengers who might be expected to have business or individual needs for staying in contact."
Terming the use of cellular phones in passenger cabins a potential "unfair practice to consumers," DOT issued the ANPRM in direct response to pending legislation that, if enacted, would significantly revise earlier Federal Communications Commission policies to allow passengers onboard commercial airliners to make or receive calls while in flight.
Koester noted that the crowded passenger environment onboard a FAR Part 121 commercial airliner differs greatly from that of the typically much smaller aircraft configured for business purposes. The proposed DOT ban would also apply to use of mobile devices for voice communications in the passenger cabins of these smaller aircraft.
"Our Members' aviation uses are very diverse," NBAA stated in its comments. "In each case, our Members place a premium on the value of their time and on the ability to remain connected whenever they deem it necessary," regardless of whether those flights are conducted as non-common carriage under Parts 91, 91 Subpart K, or 125, or as single-entity charters operated under Parts 121, 129 and 135.
In every one of those cases, NBAA added, "it is left to each customer’s discretion whether onboard phones will be used for conversation or will be left unused."
Koester also stressed the economic impact from the DOT’s proposed ban. "Recognizing the advantages of cellular communications capabilities when conducting business in flight, a significant number of private operators have already installed the advanced systems necessary to allow these capabilities," at a cost of as much as $150,000 per aircraft, he said.
"Even onboard a charter aircraft, you're likely talking about occupants traveling on behalf of their employer, or with a similar shared interest and need to conduct company business while in flight," Koester concluded. "We want to ensure that this important benefit of business aviation is not taken away."
More News
Outboard Section Of The Right Wing And The Right Flap Separated In Flight And The Airplane Impacted A Farm Field Analysis: The pilot was approaching his destination airport under i>[...]
Final Approach Fix The fix from which the final approach (IFR) to an airport is executed and which identifies the beginning of the final approach segment. It is designated on Gover>[...]
"Our choice of when to respond, how to respond and on which targets to respond is a consideration that we make every time... Netanyahu also noted that anyone attacking Israel &ldqu>[...]
Estimated (EST) When used in NOTAMs “EST” is a contraction that is used by the issuing authority only when the condition is expected to return to service prior to the e>[...]
Aero Linx: Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations (CAPA) The Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations (CAPA) is the world’s largest pilot trade association representing ove>[...]