Photographer Sues Surrey Police For False Arrest | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sat, Jan 10, 2015

Photographer Sues Surrey Police For False Arrest

Was Legally Using A UAV To Photograph A News Event

A photographer who was legally using a UAV to get aerial images of a fire in a mobile home park in Surrey, England has sued the local police after he was arrested for flying the aircraft.

The Press Gazette newspaper reports that Eddie Mitchell was working on a freelance contract for the BBC. He is licensed by the Civil Aviation Authority to fly the hexcopter for commercial purposes, and on December 30th he was photographing the scene of a fatal fire at a mobile home park ... called a caravan site in the U.K. ... when he was arrested while his aircraft was still airborne.

Mitchell said that the police took his controls and place him in handcuffs, then attempted to land the aircraft. The landing damaged the UAV to the point it was unusable.

Mitchell did everything right. He found a safe place from which to operate the UAV, and got permission from the landowner to fly. None of that carried any weight with the police.

Mitchell was held in a cell for about five hours on a "breach of the peace" charge, and was eventually released when BBC lawyers got involved. But by that time, the news value of the photographs was gone. Meanwhile, he did not get his aircraft back until the next day, causing him to lose two days work. When he did get it back, the landing by the police had rendered it inoperable.

Mitchell told the paper he's worked hard to develop a good working relationship with the police, and they normally treat him well when he's working. But because of the lost revenue and damaged aircraft, he's suing the department for £5,000, or about $7,500. He is also asking the Association of Chief Police Officers to issue new guidance on working with legal UAV operators.

(Image from file)

FMI: www.acpo.police.uk

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.30.25): Ground Stop (GS)

Ground Stop (GS) The GS is a process that requires aircraft that meet a specific criteria to remain on the ground. The criteria may be airport specific, airspace specific, or equip>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.30.25)

Aero Linx: Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) improves safety and public confidence in aviation, marine and rail transport thro>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.30.25)

“The Palo Alto stopover confirmed—yet again—that flight schools and aero-clubs are no longer just curious about electric training; they are ready to buy. In just >[...]

NTSB Final Report: ICON A5

Pilot’s Failure To Maintain Clearance From The Water While Flying At A Low Altitude Analysis: The flight of two airplanes was in cruise flight on a north heading about 50 ft >[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC