Industry Upset Follows FAA Legal Interpretation Of Maintenance Practices | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Oct 10, 2024

Industry Upset Follows FAA Legal Interpretation Of Maintenance Practices

Opinion Upends Model In Place For 60 Years

On September 3, attorneys for the FAA issued a legal interpretation of 14 CFR §43.3(d), which changes how the FAA views the model of standard maintenance supervision that has been in place since the 1960s and threatening general aviation maintenance operations.

The language of §43.3(d) defines the process through which anyone was allowed to perform maintenance on aircraft, but not inspections, provided they are supervised by someone certificated to perform the task being done. This allows shops to train new mechanics and allows for owner-assisted maintenance. It also allows shops to utilize more staff resources, which makes the entire maintenance industry function more efficiently.

The key phrase is “…to the extent necessary to ensure that it is being done properly.” In practice, certificated A&P mechanics teach staff, trainees, and owners how to do the various tasks, and then use their judgment and discretion to assess when they need to assist or instruct. For example, new trainees or owners need more attention than one who has worked in the shop for years.

The issue began when a FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) manager requested an interpretation of whether the supervisor must be physically present to supervise or if they may do it through zoom, facetime, or other electronic methods. Two years later the FAA responded.

The first part of the new interpretation states that “in person” explicitly requires the physical presence of the supervisor and that virtual presence cannot be used in its place. The second part states that the certified mechanic must be available not just to answer questions but to notice mistakes and take over if necessary.

The first part is surprising in the present day when remote technologies are used in innumerable settings for meetings, demonstrations, and where medicine and even surgery can be performed remotely. Heck, much of the FAA’s own supervisory work is done remotely.

The second part of the legal interpretation completely disregards the idea of supervisor discretion and ignores its own words in §43.3(d) that says “to the extent necessary to ensure that it is being done properly.” It essentially says that a certificated mechanic must be looking over the shoulder of every employee, trainee, and owner while they, for example, change the airplane’s oil, every time they change the oil.

Feedback from maintenance shops indicates that the one-to-one model the interpretation specifies would force them to cut staff. In a world where maintenance shops are already backlogged for months, this is causing some resistance. National aviation groups are challenging the interpretation, and only time will tell how the FAA will handle this latest affront to the industry.

FMI:  www.aopa.org/

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra Aircraft Announces the Extra 330SX

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): An Even Faster Rolling Extra! Jim Campbell joined General Manager of Extra Aircraft Duncan Koerbel at AirVenture 2023 to talk about what’s up and>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.15.25)

“Receiving our Permit to Fly and starting Phase 4 marks a defining moment for Vertical Aerospace. Our team has spent months verifying every core system under close regulatory>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.15.25): Middle Marker

Middle Marker A marker beacon that defines a point along the glideslope of an ILS normally located at or near the point of decision height (ILS Category I). It is keyed to transmit>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Lancair 320

The Experienced Pilot Chose To Operate In Instrument Meteorological Conditions Without An Instrument Flight Rules Clearance Analysis: The airplane was operated on a personal cross->[...]

Airborne 11.14.25: Last DC-8 Retires, Boeing Recovery, Teeny Trig TXP

Also: ATI Strike Prep, Spirit Still Troubled, New CubCrafters Dealership, A-29 Super Tucano Samaritan’s Purse is officially moving its historic Douglas DC-8 cargo jet into re>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC