Tue, Feb 22, 2022
"Attendants Continue to Face Physical and Verbal Abuse, Cannot Sit by and Allow Offenses" Says APFA
The issue of exactly how far the industry should go to punish disruptive airline passengers has been the subject of considerable disagreement between a bevy of sociopolitical commentators and industry stakeholders, after a solid 2-year increase in incidents causing problems throughout the transportation network.

The Association of Professional Flight Attendants has joined the chorus of industry voices pushing for disruptive passengers to be placed on the no-fly list, essentially blacklisting them across any commercial aviation services. In their statement, they say the move stems from concern "for the safety of our passengers and crew and never know what to expect when the aircraft takes off. The position of our Union has been clear and consistent: We must ensure these offenders face prosecution to the full extent of the law with appropriate fines, criminal penalties, and applicable flying bans."
Unruly-passenger incidents reported to the FAA have risen sharply since 2020, thought to be brought on by a series of societal shifts and stressors innate to post-pandemic travel. Under the FAA's new zero-tolerance policy, offenders who are cited for breaching federal regulations in-air are shunted direct to civil penalties up to $37,000 per violation, moving past counseling requirements or warnings as it did before the change. The no-fly list is controversial to some, given the apparent inability to restore flight rights for those placed on it in addition to the typical error-prone, bureaucratic inefficiency inherent to such databases.

It is notable that some Senators have opposed the measure as too far-reaching, despite having constituencies with "large numbers of American Flight Attendants at crew bases in Dallas, Ft. Worth, and Miami," according to the association. They make mention of Texas and Florida senators that "sent a letter to DOT Secretary Buttigieg in opposition to the creation of a federal “no-fly” list, leaving our crews at risk." Given the somewhat widespread industry support, like the recent comments by Delta CEO Ed Bastian in support of the measure, it could see implementation in the near future should disruptive passenger rates continue to rise.
More News
Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]
Aero Linx: T-34 Association, Inc. The T-34 Association was formed in July 1975 so that individuals purchasing then military surplus T-34As had an organization which would provide s>[...]
As He Released The Brakes To Begin Taxiing, The Brake Pedals Went To The Floor With No Braking Action Analysis: The pilot reported that during engine start up, he applied the brake>[...]
“Legislation like the Mental Health in Aviation Act is still imperative to hold the FAA accountable for the changes they clearly acknowledge need to be made... We cannot wait>[...]
Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]