Owner Of UAV That Crashed On White House Lawn Blames Manufacturer | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Feb 02, 2015

Owner Of UAV That Crashed On White House Lawn Blames Manufacturer

Says His Friend Should Not Be Held Responsible For 'The Whole Fiasco'

So you let your inebriated friend fly your quadcopter at 0300 near the White House and it winds up in pieces on the White House Grounds ... sparking a major secret service search, a lockdown of the residence, and renewed calls for regulation of UAV flights from no less than the President himself.

It's mostly the manufacturer's fault ... right?

That's what the owner of the UAV ... made by Chinese-based DJI ... told ABC news.

Neither the pilot or the owner has been identified, but apparently a condition called "flyaway" is fairly common with the type of UAV that was involved in the accident, according to ABC News. "It just goes rogue," the owner said. "It goes where it wants."

The company's message boards are reportedly flooded with posts about "flyaway." "It's an amazing product flaw," one poster writes.

But another message says the condition is more likely caused by pilot error and "environmental interference" such as microwave or cell tower RF in an area where the aircraft is being flown.

The owner of the UAV said the incident was not the fault of the friend who was flying the aircraft, who now reportedly is facing criminal charges in the case. They describe a situation where the friend, alone early Monday morning, launched the aircraft and "it just shot up so high that he couldn't see it any more."

The charges may stem from local laws that prohibit UAV flights in Washington, D.C., as well as federal rules the ban such flights near the White House. But law enforcement officials do concede that the operator had no "malicious intent" for the flight.

DJI said last year at a forum that such "flyaway" incidents can be prevented by closely following the instructions included with its aircraft.

(Secret Service Photo)

FMI: www.fbi.gov

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Pure Aerial Precision - The Snowbirds at AirVenture 2016

From 2016 (YouTube Edition): The Canadian Forces Snowbirds Can Best Be Described As ‘Elegant’… EAA AirVenture 2016 was a great show and, in no small part, it was>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecna P2012 Traveller

Airplane Lunged Forward When It Was Stuck From Behind By A Tug That Was Towing An Unoccupied Airliner Analysis: At the conclusion of the air taxi flight, the flight crew were taxii>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.23.25)

Aero Linx: International Stinson Club So you want to buy a Stinson. Well the Stinson is a GREAT value aircraft. The goal of the International Stinson Club is to preserve informatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.23.25): Request Full Route Clearance

Request Full Route Clearance Used by pilots to request that the entire route of flight be read verbatim in an ATC clearance. Such request should be made to preclude receiving an AT>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.23.25)

"Today's battlefield is adapting rapidly. By teaching our soldiers to understand how drones work and are built, we are giving them the skills to think creatively and apply emerging>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC