Class Action Filed Against Volato for WARN Violation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-
10.14.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.15.25

Airborne-NextGen-10.16.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Wed, Sep 18, 2024

Class Action Filed Against Volato for WARN Violation

Employees Allege Mass Layoffs Without Required Notice

Terminated employees have filed a class action lawsuit against Volato for alleged violations of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. Submitted on September 12, the complaint accuses the fractional jet company of failing to provide 60 days’ notice before executing mass layoffs.

The class claimed that, towards the end of August, Volato fired over 233 of their employees without giving any warning. This is a clear breach of the WARN Act, which requires employers with over 100 employees to notify staff members at least 60 days before significant layoffs or plant closings.

The plaintiffs also argue that Volato's actions have deprived them of necessary compensation and benefits, causing significant financial damage.

“This case is about holding Volato accountable for the harm it has caused its employees,” commented Ryan Barack, a Board Certified Labor and Employment Attorney and lead counsel for the plaintiffs. “Employers are required by law to provide notice before significant layoffs, and Volato’s failure to comply with the WARN Act has had a devastating impact on its workforce.”

The layoffs come during a rough period for Volato. The company recently stooped to signing an aircraft management services agreement with a competitor, flyExclusive. This could also allow Volato to be purchased before the terms expire next year.

“This strategic move is expected to strengthen our position in the market and provide new opportunities for growth,” Volato’s termination letters stated. “However, as we transition through this period, it has become necessary to adjust our workforce to better align with our current and future operational needs.”

The plaintiffs are searching for class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, allowing them to represent all employees affected. Additionally, they are requesting injunctive relief to ensure that Volato adheres to the WARN Act moving forward.

FMI: www.flyvolato.com

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.15.25: Phantom 3500 Confounds, Citation CJ3 Gen2 TC, True Blue Power

Also: Kodiak 100 Joins USFS, Innovative Solutions & Support Renamed, Gulfstream Selects Honeywell, Special Olympics Airlift The Phantom 3500 mockup made an appearance where the>[...]

Updated: Gryder Arrested On Gun Charge, Cites ‘Georgia Stand Your Ground’ Law

Incidents Allegedly Occured As Described in Police Report(s) 25-005809 and 25-005818 The name ’Dan Gryder’ is fairly well known to many in aviation.... Whether you like>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.18.25)

“Recent U.S. government policy updates emphasizing investment in domestic drone manufacturing align perfectly with our joint venture objectives, positioning us to meet critic>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.18.25): Final Approach Point

Final Approach Point The point, applicable only to a nonprecision approach with no depicted FAF (such as an on airport VOR), where the aircraft is established inbound on the final >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Eyeing the Hawk

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): The Best of the Eighties in the Early Twenties It can be argued with confidence that the father of the Ultralight aircraft from which the Light-Sport A>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC