Owner Of Damaged TBM Sues FBO, Owner | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.10.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.12.24 Airborne-FltTraining-06.13.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.14.24

Mon, Jan 23, 2012

Owner Of Damaged TBM Sues FBO, Owner

Charges Irresponsibility, Misleading Advertising

The owner of a turboprop aircraft has retained an attorney and filed suit against a Groton, CT FBO and its owner after his plane was damaged by a fuel truck while in for repairs. The FBO acknowledges its role, and says it has insurance, but the lawsuit may be attempting to reach past the corporate "veil" to target the owner personally.

TheDay.com reports George Sampas flew his 2006 Socata TBM (similar plane pictured) to the Groton airport on August 9, 2011 to be repaired by Lanmar Aviation. In his complaint filed in U.S. District Court, Sampas alleges FBO employees completed the repairs, but then backed a fuel truck into the plane, forcing it off its chocks and damaging the tail and fuselage.

The suit claims that Lanmar, and its owner and president, Richard Polidori neglected to maintain standard operating and safety procedures, and adds that that the company's claim of high safety standards in its advertising is misleading. Sampas explained in a phone interview with TheDay, ""The fact that they didn't have adequate safety procedures in place is irresponsible. They advertise themselves as being a safe FBO."

The repairs are estimated at $400,000, but Sampas also wants $20,000 per month for loss of use, and claims that even after repairs, the plane won't be worth what it was before the damage was done. He wants a total of $690,000 in compensation, or for Lanmar to buy the plane from his for what it would have been worth before the accident.

Attorney Steven Arnold is representing Polidori, and has moved to dismiss the suit. He notes that Lanmar, through its insurance company, has acknowledged the company's responsibility, and says Sampas has no grounds to sue Polidori personally.

FMI: www.lanmaraviation.net ; www.tbm850.com

Advertisement

More News

ANNouncement: Now Accepting Applications For Oshkosh 2024 Stringers!!!

An Amazing Experience Awaits The Chosen Few... Oshkosh, to us, seems the perfect place to get started on watching aviation recover the past couple of years... and so ANN is putting>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.13.24)

“NBAA has a tremendous responsibility to the business aviation industry, and we are constantly collaborating with them. Our flight departments, professionals and aircraft own>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.13.24): Dead Reckoning

Dead Reckoning Dead reckoning, as applied to flying, is the navigation of an airplane solely by means of computations based on airspeed, course, heading, wind direction, and speed,>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.13.24)

Aero Linx: Vertical Aviation Safety Team (VAST) We are a public–private initiative to enhance worldwide flight operations safety in all segments of the vertical flight indust>[...]

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC