Tankers on Sale | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.03.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.04.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.05.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Affordable Flying Expo Tickets (Discount Code: AFE2025): CLICK HERE!
LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall, 1800ET, 11.07.25: www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 14, 2003

Tankers on Sale

Boeing Drops Price, Solves 'Combi' Problem

A Reuters story says that, for reasons unknown (unexpected competition from Airbus? unbridled patriotism?), unnamed DoD officials, "said Boeing officials had agreed to trim the price of each 767-200ER aircraft to around $136 million, bringing the overall price of the lease deal down to around $14 billion from $17 billion. The revised deal calls for the Air Force to purchase the tankers at the end of the six-year lease term for an additional $3.5 billion, down from $4 billion in the original deal."

The military, hoping to assuage cashflow problems, has turned to aircraft leasing -- 11 new 767-based tankers will soon join the fleet of 545 (707-based) KC-135s -- as one useful strategy. The effect of long-term debt (on a purchase deal) would be moved to a new line on the balance sheet, and the cash outlay, year-to-year, could also be reduced.

Government deals, immune from IRS prying and interference, can use more-creative ways to save money than private-sector businesses; and their motivations and constraints are also considerably different. A lease, for government, could be the wave of the future.

There's another twist to the newest 767 tanker deal, too: unlike recent iterations, the machines would be configurable to convert from tanker to transport duty and back, rather than the so-called "combi" machines, which would carry some cargo and/or troops, but less fuel. Apparently, someone at DoD figured that the likelihood of a mission that would require troops on an aerial refueling route was small enough that a more-specialized aircraft would answer the need.

FMI: www.dod.gov, www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.07.25): Microburst

Microburst A small downburst with outbursts of damaging winds extending 2.5 miles or less. In spite of its small horizontal scale, an intense microburst could induce wind speeds as>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.07.25)

“As we start to implement this drawdown in service. It will be restricted to these 40 high volume traffic markets. We’re going to ask the airlines to work with us colla>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.08.25)

Aero Linx: European Association for Aviation Psychology (EAAP) Since 1956 the European Association for Aviation Psychology (EAAP) provides a forum for professionals working in the >[...]

Airborne 11.05.25: Tesla Flying Car?, Jepp/ForeFlight Sold, A220 Troubles

Also: AFE25 Tickets!, Jamaica Recovery, E-Aircraft at Boeing Fld, Diamond DA50 RG Cert Elon Musk is once again promising the impossible…this time, in the form of a Tesla tha>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC