Fri, Sep 30, 2011
Carriers Say Anti-Terrorism Costs Are Taxpayers'
Responsibility
The airline industry, which two years ago was an active
proponent of user fees for general aviation, now finds itself on
the defensive against an Obama administration proposal to jack up
its own user fees by 50 percent to cover bloated airport security
costs. The proposal may bring a more serious look at the
cost/benefit of what is commonly called "security theater."
The administration's expressed goal is to aid in deficit
reduction by making airline passengers pay for 75 percent of the
cost of security, up from the current 50 percent. But the airlines
argue that it's not fair to single out their industry for that
burden, any more than it would be fair to add a security fee to the
prices of boxcutters, shoes or underpants.
Steve Lott of the Air Transport Association tells the
New York Times, "No other mode of
transportation bears the cost of security like the aviation
industry and its passengers. Security should be a federal function,
and it should be funded as such."
Lott also questions oversight of security spending. "The amount
of money that the industry and its passengers have paid to fund
security has soared 50 percent since 2002. Congress has a
responsibility to scrutinize how the money is being spent."
Stephen Lord is director of homeland security issues at the
Government Accountability Office, and backs up Lott's concern. He
notes the infamous air puffer machines which had to be scrapped
because they didn't work, and the $750 million spent on training
and deploying specialized officers to conduct behavioral screening
at airports with no solid evidence the tactic was effective. He
tells the Times, "Usually you validate a concept and then you field
it, but they deployed the program and then they started validating
it, which we have some concerns about."
Bob Poole, director of transportation studies for The Reason
Foundation, says he supports the premise of shifting security costs
from taxpayers to travelers, and predicts it will bring more
attention to excesses in spending on security.
In the meantime, the airlines are on the same page with general
aviation on at least one issue - fighting the President's proposed
$100 per-takeoff user fee on flights using air traffic control
services.
More News
An Amazing Experience Awaits The Chosen Few... Oshkosh, to us, seems the perfect place to get started on watching aviation recover the past couple of years... and so ANN is putting>[...]
“NBAA has a tremendous responsibility to the business aviation industry, and we are constantly collaborating with them. Our flight departments, professionals and aircraft own>[...]
Dead Reckoning Dead reckoning, as applied to flying, is the navigation of an airplane solely by means of computations based on airspeed, course, heading, wind direction, and speed,>[...]
Aero Linx: Vertical Aviation Safety Team (VAST) We are a public–private initiative to enhance worldwide flight operations safety in all segments of the vertical flight indust>[...]
We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]