Sky King Sues Team | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-09.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
09.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-09.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-09.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-09.12.25

Tue, Jun 15, 2004

Sky King Sues Team

Former Co-Owner Says Flight Contract Illegally Terminated

You almost need a program to follow this one...

Seems Sacramento (CA)-based charter carrier Sky King is suing the NBA Kings. The airline, owned by former basketball team co-owner Greg Lukenbill, wants $8.2 million because the Kings -- the basketball team, that is -- wrongfully terminated its agreement to use Sky King -- the airline, not the team -- to fly the players from game to game.

Whew!

This whole mess started back in 1985, when Lukenbill, a Sacramento-area developer, helped bring the basketball team to town. In 1990, he started the airline Sky King to fly the team from city to city. But in 2000, the basketball team stopped flying Sky King and started using a charter set up by the NBA. The charter operation charges teams based on the total number of players from all teams it flies. In the season just ending, that charter contract was awarded to Pace Airlines of Winston-Salem (NC).

"Obviously there is a disagreement," said team attorney David Price, in an interview with the Sacramento Business Journal. Price said he'd seen only a draft of the suit. "The team wouldn't have terminated the contract several years ago if it didn't feel strongly that there was a nonperformance by Sky King."

Lukenbill, who filed suit against the team May 27th, didn't have a lot to say when a reporter called: "I don't want to know what the subject is, I have no comment, thank you much."

Sky King and the Sacramento Kings singed a contract in 1997 to fly the team around in a Boeing 737 for $1.2 million a year. The contract was extended in 1998 and was supposed to run out at the end of this month, according to the Sacramento Business Journal.

Then the team changed hands and the new owners told Lukenbill they wanted a different aircraft. There were letters -- nasty letters -- between new owner Geoff Petrie and Lukenbill. Sky King told the basketball franchise a new plane would cost an extra $400,000 a year. That's when Petrie started grumbling about safety, saying, "as you can appreciate, the Kings are very concerned because of the numerous technical or mechanical problems which the plane experienced over the past NBA season."

The lawsuit doesn't list any of those problems.

But in October 1999, the Sacramento Business Journal reports Petrie asked Lukenbill to have Sky King certified as a Part 121 operator to ensure safety and a high technical standard. He asked Sky King to appoint a safety director in accordance with Part 121. Lukenbill offered himself for the job. Petrie didn't like that. But the FAA named Lukenbill anyway and, as safety director, he told Petrie that he spent $6.5 million on beefing up safety standards.

Sky King was awarded its Part 121 certificate by the FAA in October, 2002. By that time, however, the team had found another carrier.

See ya in court.

FMI: www.nba.com/kings

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Lancair NLA-275-FR-C

About 2132 And At 11,800 Ft MSL, The Airplane Began A Rapid Right Spiraling Descent On August 18, 2025, about 2133 central daylight time, a Lancair NLA-275-FR-C airplane, N345LA, w>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (09.12.25)

Aero Linx: The Collings Foundation The Collings Foundation is a non-profit, Educational Foundation (501(c)3), founded in 1979. The purpose of the Foundation is to preserve and exhi>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (09.12.25)

"This first FAA certification enables us to address the pilot shortage crisis with modern training solutions. Flight schools need alternatives to aging fleets with 40-year-old desi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (09.12.25): North Atlantic High Level Airspace (NAT HLA)

North Atlantic High Level Airspace (NAT HLA) That volume of airspace (as defined in ICAO Document 7030) between FL 285 and FL 420 within the Oceanic Control Areas of Bodo Oceanic, >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (09.13.25)

“HITRON embodies the Coast Guard’s spirit of innovation and adaptability. From its humble beginnings as a prototype program, it has evolved into a vital force in our co>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC