Jetblue Fined For Violating Disability, Code-Share Disclosure Rules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Dec 14, 2010

Jetblue Fined For Violating Disability, Code-Share Disclosure Rules

Carrier Assessed $600,000, Nearly Half Must Go To Improving Accessibility For The Disabled

The U.S. DOT assessed a civil penalty against JetBlue Airways on Monday for violating rules protecting air travelers with disabilities and for failing to disclose when flights sold by the carrier were being operated under a code-sharing arrangement. The carrier was assessed a civil penalty of $600,000, of which $350,000 must be paid by the carrier and up to $250,000 may be used to improve its service to disabled passengers beyond what is required by law.

"We expect airlines to treat their passengers fairly, and we will not hesitate to take enforcement action when carriers fail to respect their rights," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.

DOT's rules implementing the Air Carrier Access Act  require airlines to provide assistance to passengers with disabilities in boarding and deplaning aircraft, including the use of wheelchairs, ramps, mechanical lifts or service personnel where needed.  Carriers also must respond within 30 days to written complaints about their treatment of disabled passengers and specifically address the issues raised in each complaint. In addition, airlines must also submit annual reports to the Department on disability-related complaints from passengers, noting for each complaint the type of disability and the nature of the complaint.

Following a visit to JetBlue's headquarters in March, DOT's Aviation Enforcement Office reviewed complaints about the treatment of passengers with disabilities filed with the carrier and with DOT. The complaints revealed a number of violations of the requirement to provide enplaning and deplaning assistance. In addition, the Enforcement Office found that the carrier frequently did not provide an adequate written response to complaints from disabled passengers and that it failed to properly categorize disability complaints in reports filed with the Department.

In addition, the Enforcement Office made a number of telephone calls to JetBlue's reservation line and found that the carrier's agents failed to disclose that flights sold by the carrier were being operated by Cape Air, a JetBlue code-share affiliate. DOT rules require airlines to disclose to consumers, before they book a flight, if the flight is operated under a code-sharing arrangement under which a carrier will sell tickets on flights that use its designator code but are operated by a different airline. The disclosure must include the corporate name of the transporting carrier and any other name under which the flight is offered to the public.

Of the $600,000 penalty, up to $250,000 may be used to establish a task force to audit the carrier's handling of passengers with disabilities, to create a disability customer care center that will reach out to disabled passengers prior to travel and serve as an information resource for them, and to enhance the carrier's website to improve its information for travelers with disabilities. The actual cost of these improvements is substantially greater than $250,000.

FMI: www.dot.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.11.25)

"The owners envisioned something modern and distinctive, yet deeply meaningful. We collaborated closely to refine the flag design so it complemented the aircraft’s contours w>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.11.25): Nonradar Arrival

Nonradar Arrival An aircraft arriving at an airport without radar service or at an airport served by a radar facility and radar contact has not been established or has been termina>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: David Uhl and the Lofty Art of Aircraft Portraiture

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Still Life with Verve David Uhl was born into a family of engineers and artists—a backdrop conducive to his gleaning a keen appreciation for the >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 12.09.25: Amazon Crash, China Rocket Accident, UAV Black Hawk

Also: Electra Goes Military, Miami Air Taxi, Hypersonics Lab, MagniX HeliStrom Amazon’s Prime Air drones are back in the spotlight after one of its newest MK30 delivery drone>[...]

Airborne 12.05.25: Thunderbird Ejects, Lost Air india 737, Dynon Update

Also: Trailblazing Aviator Betty Stewart, Wind Farm Scrutiny, Chatham Ban Overturned, Airbus Shares Dive A Thunderbird pilot, ID'ed alternately as Thunderbird 5 or Thunderbird 6, (>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC