Lawsuits Against FAA, DOD, American Take Shape | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Tue, Feb 04, 2025

Lawsuits Against FAA, DOD, American Take Shape

Government Officials Take the Blame for Fatal DC Crash

Families of the victims in January 29th’s midair collision near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) are beginning to explore legal action against the federal government. Statements from President Trump and other officials pinning blame on the military helicopter could play a major role in these claims.

Trump and his cabinet have publicly acknowledged fault in the crash, which involved an Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter and an American Eagle regional jet, killing 67 people.

“It was far above the 200 foot limit. That’s not really too complicated to understand, is it???" Trump stated.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also suggested that the DOD would take responsibility, saying at a White House press conference, "No excuses, we’re going to get to the bottom of this… it never should have happened."

Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, victims’ families must file a notice of claim before pursuing litigation against the government. If the claim is denied or no decision is made within six months, they can proceed with a lawsuit. Cases against the government would be decided by a judge rather than a jury.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) preliminary investigation will take a month, with a final report expected in over a year. However, civil litigation against American Airlines, the FAA, and the DOD will not wait for the NTSB’s conclusions.

Attorneys will use flight recorder data, media reports, and forensic analysis to build their cases. While NTSB "probable cause" conclusions are not admissible in court, the underlying factual findings can be introduced as evidence.

Pittsburgh Attorney Jason Matzus, who has worked on similar cases, emphasized that non-economic damages will be the most compelling factor in settlements. “Claims will be significant. It’s premature, but conservatively speaking these will be multimillion-dollar claims each,” he said.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Rutan Long-EZ

He Attempted To Restart The Engine Three Times. On The Third Restart Attempt, He Noticed That Flames Were Coming Out From The Right Wing Near The Fuel Cap Analysis: The pilot repor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: ICAS Perspectives - Advice for New Air Show Performers

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Leading Air Show Performers Give Their Best Advice for Newcomers On December 6th through December 9th, the Paris Las Vegas Hotel hosted over 1,500 air >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.28.25)

Aero Linx: NASA ASRS ASRS captures confidential reports, analyzes the resulting aviation safety data, and disseminates vital information to the aviation community. The ASRS is an i>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.28.25)

“For our inaugural Pylon Racing Seminar in Roswell, we were thrilled to certify 60 pilots across our six closed-course pylon race classes. Not only did this year’s PRS >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC