No Evidence That A Drone Collided With An Airliner In Mexico | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.19.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.21.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.23.25

Fri, Dec 21, 2018

No Evidence That A Drone Collided With An Airliner In Mexico

Aeromexico 737s Radome Damage Could Have Been Structural Failure

Last week, another breathless report of a drone colliding with an airliner made the media and Internet rounds. In this instance, an Aeromexico Boeing 737 was on approach to Tijuana when the crew heard a "pretty loud bang". The airplane landed safely, and photos of the nose of the airplane show fairly extensive damage to its radome.

With no evidence of blood or feathers, a bird strike was not the obvious cause, so a drone became the likely culprit, at least in the minds of some.

But according to DroneDJ reports that the Aviation Safety Network reports that "there is no confirmation or evidence that a drone strike actually took place. Cases are known of nose cone structural failures without any collision, such as to a LAM B737 in Mozambique in 2017. This incident was initially and erroneously blamed on a drone strike."

ASN continues to say that "cases are also known to have radome implosion over time due to previous birdstrikes as was the case with F-100 DAGPH on 1 July, 2010."

The website Fstoppers reports that in a recording of radio communications between the flight crew and ATC, the pilots mention a possible bird strike but say they did not see anything. The airport is near the U.S. border, and the approach to the runway being used by the airplane takes it over U.S. territory. Drone flights are prohibited in the area from ground level up to 2,000 feet, according to an FAA NOTAM.

The airplane was manufactured by Boeing in 2001.

(Image from AFAC Casa Branca via Facebook)

FMI: DroneDJ, Air Safety Network, Fstoppers

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.25.25)

“Each Honor Flight mission is a special occasion, but the ability to be a part of EAA AirVenture always creates unforgettable moments. Honoring our local Vietnam veterans out>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Efficient Versatility -- NASA GL-10 Greased Lightning

From 2015 (YouTube Edition): The Airframes Displayed At AUVSI 2015 Were Quite Innovative It’s common to visualize a small vertical lift UAV as having 4 to 6 propellers, it&rs>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cessna 525

The Airplane Began A Descent While Still In A Right Turn And Impacted Terrain On March 13, 2025, about 0733 central daylight time, a Cessna 525A airplane, N525CZ, was destroyed whe>[...]

Klyde Morris (05.23.25)

It Looks Like It's Gonna Get A Bit Tight, Klyde FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.20.25: Drone Regs, Zero-Emission Cargo, Door-Dash Drone

Also: Blackhawk’s Replacement, Supersonic Flight, Archer 1Q/25, Long-Range VTOL Program U.S. Secretary of Transportation Sean P. Duffy released an update on progress being ma>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC