FAA Says Proposed Massachusetts Wind Turbine Too Tall | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-SpecialEpisode-12.15.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.16.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Jan 11, 2010

FAA Says Proposed Massachusetts Wind Turbine Too Tall

Planned Structure Is 5.5 Miles From New Bedford Regional Airport

One of two wind turbines proposed by the city of Dartmouth, Massachusetts could interfere with air navigation, the FAA has told the city. The FAA said that the planned 462 foot structure "exceeds obstruction standards and/or would have an adverse physical or electromagnetic interference" for aircraft approaching new Bedford Regional Airport.

According to Southcoast Today, the FAA recommends lowering the overall height of the structure to 417 feet from blade tip to base, or, if an independent analysis of the terrain meets with FAA approval, reducing the structure to 428 feet.

The FAA ruling applies only to the north turbine. The agency is still considering the south structure. Dr. Ronald DiPippo, chairman of the town's Alternative Energy Committee, told the paper the height of the pole to the hub would have to be reduced 35 feet to meet the 428 foot maximum. Select Board Chairman Joseph L. Michaud said the town will conduct a site survey and attempt to win FAA approval the taller tower. He said he expects the south turbine to be approved at 462 feet because it is further from the airport.

DiPippo said the town expects to save over $500,000 in the first year in energy costs by constructing the two turbines on land the municipality owns. But, he said, that would have been about $100,000 more if the taller tower could have been built.

The paper reports that the council members are not entirely surprised the FAA came back proposing changes. "We figured there would be some adjustments to the project," Michaud said. "It's not a major adjustment and it should be more favorable with the people who have concerns about the height."

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.19.25): Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF)

Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF) The frequency band between 300 and 3,000 MHz. The bank of radio frequencies used for military air/ground voice communications. In some instances this may >[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22T

During The 7 Second Descent, There Was Another TAWS Alert At Which Time The Engine Remained At Full Power On October 24, 2025 at 2115 mountain daylight time, a Cirrus SR22T, N740TS>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Red Tail Project--Carrying the Torch of the Tuskegee Airmen

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Educational Organization Aims to Inspire by Sharing Tuskegee Story Founding leader Don Hinz summarized the Red Tail Project’s mission in simple, >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.19.25)

“This feels like an important step since space travel for people with disabilities is still in its very early days... I’m so thankful and hope it inspires a change in m>[...]

Airborne 12.17.25: Skydiver Hooks Tail, Cooper Rotax Mount, NTSB v NDAA

Also: New Katanas, Kern County FD Training, IndiGo’s Botched Roster, MGen. Leavitt Named ERAU Dean The Australian Transportation Safety Bureau (ATSB) has wrapped up its inves>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC