Lawmakers: Is Return To Flight Worth The Risk? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Mon, Sep 15, 2003

Lawmakers: Is Return To Flight Worth The Risk?

Getting The Shuttles Aloft May Simply Be Too Dangerous

Is it worth it? Almost eight months after the Columbia tragedy, some members of Congress say the space program lacks direction, the budget is too tight and the space agency has a culture that simply isn't thoughtful enough about safety.

"We're putting American men and women at great risk for their lives, flying orbiters that are 30 years old that cannot be made safe," Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) told NASA chief Sean O'Keefe at a congressional hearing. "My proposal is ... to use these orbiters in an unmanned capacity, build a new space plane or space orbiter that's just for people."

But O'Keefe faced perhaps the most poignant question from Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS): "Are we throwing good money after bad?" Picking up the pieces and analyzing what went wrong in the February 1st Columbia crash has so far cost about the same as a single shuttle launch -- $400 million. That doesn't include implementation of the 29 recommendations made by the organization that investigated and reported on the accident, the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB).

Ironically, lawmakers at hearings last week criticized NASA for its "skimpy" budgets, as if those very lawmakers weren't instrumental in implementing cuts that have hobbled the space program for years. Yet, there seems to be little disagreement that the US "wants to retain a continuing capability to send people into space, whether to Earth orbit or beyond."

If there can be said to be a positive result from so tragic an event, it seems to be a renewed interest in moving both the technology and the agenda for space travel forward. NASA's O'Keefe put it this way: "What we're dealing with is a much more widespread ... equally frightening ... terrorist campaign that has to be countered in very different ways than the way we took on the Cold War."

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Aviat A1

Airplane Bounced About 3 Ft Then Touched Back Down And Then, With No Brakes Applied, The Airplane Began Veering To The Left Analysis: The pilot entered the airport traffic pattern >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.08.25)

Aero Linx: British Microlight Aircraft Association (BMAA) The primary focus within all aviation activity is SAFETY. In all aspects of our sport SAFETY must come first, whether it b>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Fly Corvair’s Reliable Engine Alternative

From SnF25 (YouTube Edition): William Wynne Builds Practical Aircraft Engines on the Corvair Platform Seeking an affordable alternative to the traditional aircraft engine options, >[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: CiES Fuel-Quantity and e-Throttle Systems Praised

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Bridge of CiES CiES Inc. is a Bend, Oregon-based designer and manufacturer of modular embedded aircraft systems and sensors. The company’s fuel-l>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC