Lawmakers: Is Return To Flight Worth The Risk? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.14.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.15.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.16.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.17.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Mon, Sep 15, 2003

Lawmakers: Is Return To Flight Worth The Risk?

Getting The Shuttles Aloft May Simply Be Too Dangerous

Is it worth it? Almost eight months after the Columbia tragedy, some members of Congress say the space program lacks direction, the budget is too tight and the space agency has a culture that simply isn't thoughtful enough about safety.

"We're putting American men and women at great risk for their lives, flying orbiters that are 30 years old that cannot be made safe," Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) told NASA chief Sean O'Keefe at a congressional hearing. "My proposal is ... to use these orbiters in an unmanned capacity, build a new space plane or space orbiter that's just for people."

But O'Keefe faced perhaps the most poignant question from Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS): "Are we throwing good money after bad?" Picking up the pieces and analyzing what went wrong in the February 1st Columbia crash has so far cost about the same as a single shuttle launch -- $400 million. That doesn't include implementation of the 29 recommendations made by the organization that investigated and reported on the accident, the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB).

Ironically, lawmakers at hearings last week criticized NASA for its "skimpy" budgets, as if those very lawmakers weren't instrumental in implementing cuts that have hobbled the space program for years. Yet, there seems to be little disagreement that the US "wants to retain a continuing capability to send people into space, whether to Earth orbit or beyond."

If there can be said to be a positive result from so tragic an event, it seems to be a renewed interest in moving both the technology and the agenda for space travel forward. NASA's O'Keefe put it this way: "What we're dealing with is a much more widespread ... equally frightening ... terrorist campaign that has to be countered in very different ways than the way we took on the Cold War."

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.15.25): Charted Visual Flight Procedure Approach

Charted Visual Flight Procedure Approach An approach conducted while operating on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan which authorizes the pilot of an aircraft to proceed >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.15.25)

“When l became the Secretary of Defense, I committed to rebuild our military to match threats to capabilities. Drones are the biggest battlefield innovation in a generation, >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.15.25)

Aero Linx: Stearman Restorers Association Welcome to the Stearman Restorers Association. The Stearman Restorers Association is an independent “Not for Profit” 501C-3 Co>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Kjelsrud Gary Kitfox

Airplane Exhibited A Partial Loss Of Engine Power When It Was About Halfway Down The Runway Analysis: The pilot of the experimental amateur-built airplane was departing from his pr>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cessna A150L

The Flight Path Was Consistent With Low-Altitude Maneuvering On June 18, 2025, about 0922 mountain standard time, a Cessna A150L airplane, N6436F, was substantially damaged when it>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC