Tue, Jun 10, 2003
NATA President James K. Coyne last week expressed
to Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officials his
strong concerns that the federal government's continuing efforts to
reassure the American public of their security is doing irreparable
harm to the nation's general aviation industry. Coyne's comments to
TSA officials came during a regularly scheduled meeting June 4
involving NATA and other organizations representing different
segments of the general aviation industry.
"Time and time again, we see general aviation bearing the brunt
of the federal government's public statements about specific
actions it is taking in the war on terrorism." Coyne said after the
meeting. "It is imperative that policy makers in the administration
understand that they are doing great harm to this industry when
they highlight meaningless restrictions imposed on general aviation
in the name of national security."
TSA officials in the meeting responded that the
fears expressed by Coyne and others were very real. "You have every
right" to be concerned about the damage the public's perception of
these restrictions is doing to the general aviation industry,
responded one official.
Continuing to publicize either new restrictions on general
aviation or air defense exercises involving single-engine airplanes
- as the Department of Defense did last week - is "leading to
public animosity" toward the industry Coyne said during the
meeting. "There is no need to frighten the American public about
small airplanes," noting that much has been done since September
2001 to improve general aviation security.
"Public perception is everything," Coyne said
after the meeting. "In the current environment, everything the
federal government does in the security arena is highly publicized.
When the federal government publicizes the things it is doing to
further secure general aviation without publicizing its actions to
secure rental trucks or recreational boats, it leaves the public
thinking that small airplanes are a threat while other activities
are not.
"I think the history of terrorist attacks in the U.S. and abroad
demonstrates that general aviation is not the threat many in the
federal government would have the public believe," Coyne concluded.
"Yet, that's not the message being sent by the government. That
message needs to change."
More News
Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]
The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]
Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]
"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]
Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]