Environmental Groups Come After SpaceX Operations | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Tue, Oct 22, 2024

Environmental Groups Come After SpaceX Operations

Save RGV Files Second Suit Over Wastewater Disputes

Environmental group Save RGV filed a second lawsuit against SpaceX -- just days before the company launched its fifth and quite successful Starship flight test. Save RGV is seeking an additional $56,460 per day over wastewater discharge violations.

The wastewater dispute began last year with the first Starship launch. The rocket’s Super Heavy Booster powered up its 33 engines, generating force and heat that damaged the launch site and even vaporized its toilets. SpaceX’s lack of a water deluge system, which sprays water during liftoff to protect the launch pad, was partly to blame.

These launch issues led to five environmental groups, including Save RGV, filing a suit against SpaceX. They aimed to get SpaceX’s five-year license suspended.

So, the company installed a ‘mega-steel pancake’ system with a retention pond. Still, the design lacked several features used in other launch locations. NASA’s Kennedy Space Center and Wallops Flight Facility both use a “flame trench,” allowing wastewater to be contained, cooled, and tested. Starship’s is flat, causing nearly 34,200 gallons of water to end up in the wetlands after a given launch.

The Environmental Protection Agency and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) determined that SpaceX was in violation of the Clean Water Act, imposing fines upwards of $150,000 against the company.

SpaceX asserted that the water deluge system uses “literal drinking water,” and that the fines can be chalked down to merely paperwork disagreements.

While the water entering the system may be pure, it may not exit that way. It is in the direct path of the rocket exhaust, containing high quantities of potentially toxic chemicals.

Now, Save RGV has filed a second lawsuit over the wastewater issue. SpaceX referred to the suit as "unwarranted and frivolous” in a social media post.

These arguments have put SpaceX months behind schedule, but the fight isn’t over yet. The activists hope to block SpaceX’s attempt to increase allowed test launches from 5 to 25 per year.

FMI: www.spacex.com, www.savergv.org

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Cessna 177B

Outboard Section Of The Right Wing And The Right Flap Separated In Flight And The Airplane Impacted A Farm Field Analysis: The pilot was approaching his destination airport under i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.08.25): Final Approach Fix

Final Approach Fix The fix from which the final approach (IFR) to an airport is executed and which identifies the beginning of the final approach segment. It is designated on Gover>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.08.25)

"Our choice of when to respond, how to respond and on which targets to respond is a consideration that we make every time... Netanyahu also noted that anyone attacking Israel &ldqu>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.25): Estimated (EST)

Estimated (EST) When used in NOTAMs “EST” is a contraction that is used by the issuing authority only when the condition is expected to return to service prior to the e>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.25)

Aero Linx: Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations (CAPA) The Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations (CAPA) is the world’s largest pilot trade association representing ove>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC