Court's Reversal of NTSB Decision Upholds Timely Processing Of Complaints | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.14.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.15.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.16.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.17.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Wed, Nov 05, 2003

Court's Reversal of NTSB Decision Upholds Timely Processing Of Complaints

The Good Guys Win Again... For Now

AOPA tells ANN that their recent efforts to aid a pilot, in getting the due process that all pilots are entitled to in an FAA enforcement action, seems to have borne some fruit. The DC Court of Appeals reversed a decision of the National Transportation Safety Board, saying the safety board allowed the FAA to proceed with enforcement action against a pilot in violation of a procedural "stale complaint rule."

Such a rule is intended to ensure that the FAA pursues cases with reasonable diligence so that evidence is not lost and so a threat of an enforcement action is not indefinitely hanging over a pilot's head. In this case, the FAA had evidence of a pilot's possible violation of the FARs for nine months before the matter was investigated and determined by the FAA to constitute a regulatory violation.

The delay was apparently caused by FAA staff and resource shuffling, and the evidence languished until an inspector investigated the matter. The court noted that "if diligence is required, then it should begin as soon as the ball is in the FAA's court."

AOPA Rolled Out The Big Guns

"This is good news for AOPA members," said Kathy Yodice, counsel to AOPA.

"The court is holding the NTSB, and by default the FAA, to the applicable procedures. The rules exist to protect the rights of the participants and the integrity of the process, and the rules must be applied uniformly."

AOPA counsel participated in this case as a "friend of the court," emphasizing the "importance of fairness in the process and upholding due-process protections in the rules" for all pilots. The pilot is a subscriber to the 20-year-old AOPA Legal Services Plan, which is available exclusively to AOPA members.

FMI: www.aopa.org, www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.15.25): Charted Visual Flight Procedure Approach

Charted Visual Flight Procedure Approach An approach conducted while operating on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan which authorizes the pilot of an aircraft to proceed >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.15.25)

“When l became the Secretary of Defense, I committed to rebuild our military to match threats to capabilities. Drones are the biggest battlefield innovation in a generation, >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.15.25)

Aero Linx: Stearman Restorers Association Welcome to the Stearman Restorers Association. The Stearman Restorers Association is an independent “Not for Profit” 501C-3 Co>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Kjelsrud Gary Kitfox

Airplane Exhibited A Partial Loss Of Engine Power When It Was About Halfway Down The Runway Analysis: The pilot of the experimental amateur-built airplane was departing from his pr>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cessna A150L

The Flight Path Was Consistent With Low-Altitude Maneuvering On June 18, 2025, about 0922 mountain standard time, a Cessna A150L airplane, N6436F, was substantially damaged when it>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC