NTSB Agrees To Reopen 1967 Accident Case | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.03.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.04.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.05.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.06.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.07.24

Tue, Jun 20, 2006

NTSB Agrees To Reopen 1967 Accident Case

Will Look Into Actions Of Airliner's Flight Crew

For almost 40 years, there have been questions... lots of questions... about a tragic 1967 midair collision between a Cessna 310 and a Piedmont Airlines Boeing 727 over Hendersonville, NC. Those questions lingered even after the NTSB ruled that the 310 wandered into the flight path of the 727.

Well, after years of prodding from families of those aboard the Cessna -- along with an amateur historian who has thoroughly researched the accident -- the NTSB has agreed to reopen the case, and reexamine its findings.

Aero-News first reported on amateur historian Paul Houle's efforts to get the case reopened last December. He lives a few miles from the North Carolina crash site, and has been pondering the mishap for years.

After a 14-month investigation, the NTSB originally ruled the accident was likely caused by John David Addison, the C310's pilot. The NTSB ruled that Addison had deviated from his IFR flightplan, and into the path of the speeding jet.

But Houle found evidence that it was the 727 which strayed from its cleared route -- and that the flight crew was distracted by an ashtray fire on the flight deck just seconds before impact. Furthermore, Houle discovered the NTSB's lead investigator on the case was the brother of a Piedmont vice president -- both of whom have since passed away.

Despite the NTSB's general policy of accepting requests to reopen cases only from "parties to the investigation or hearing" or those with a "direct interest," the board's acting chairman, Mark V. Rosenker, agreed to Houle's request.

"...Although the regulations do not define 'persons having a direct interest,' this language was not meant to include independent researchers who have no other connection to an accident," Rosenker wrote, according to the Springfield (MO) News-Leader.

For Grace Addison, the inquiry means her brother-in-law's name may finally be cleared.

"I've always thought there was a lot about that investigation that wasn't correct and that it needed to be looked at again," said Addison. "I'm glad it's finally going to happen."

FMI: Read The Original Probable Cause Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.07.24)

"From the end of April, our team embarked on a groundbreaking endeavor to help make cleanup efforts on Everest safer and more efficient. We are thrilled to share that our DJI FlyCa>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.07.24): Obstacle

Obstacle An existing object, object of natural growth, or terrain at a fixed geographical location or which may be expected at a fixed location within a prescribed area with refere>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.07.24)

Aero Linx: Helicopter Association of Canada (HAC) Mandate: 1) To promote a political and regulatory environment that will foster a prosperous Canadian Helicopter industry; 2) To ed>[...]

Airborne 06.03.24: Rotax 915/916 SB, Starship 4 Ready?, B-17 Mementos

Also: Hubble On Pause, FedEx Pilots Picket, Nexus eVTOL, VFS Honors The Rotax folks have published a Service Bulletin after issues were noted that may affect all R915i and R916i se>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC