NASA’s OIG Report On Management Of Mobile Launcher 2 Project | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-02.03.25

Airborne-NextGen-02.04.25

Airborne-Unlimited-02.05.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-02.06.25

Airborne-Unlimited-02.07.25

Tue, Sep 03, 2024

NASA’s OIG Report On Management Of Mobile Launcher 2 Project

Second Launcher Needed For Larger Variants Of Space Launch System

The NASA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted an audit to determine how the agency was meeting its cost, schedule, and performance goals, and the actions the agency has taken to control future cost increases and schedule delays.

NASA’s Artemis series of space missions will use the Space Launch System (SLS) super heavy lift vehicle to launch the Orion Crew module into space. The SLS booster rockets and Orion are vertically assembled into a single spacecraft on top of the mobile launch platform inside the Vehicle Assembly Building. When complete, the mobile launcher with the spacecraft on top is moved to the launch pad. NASA has one mobile launcher, ML-1, for initial Artemis launches. A second, larger one, ML-2, is needed to handle larger SLS variants starting with the Artemis IV launch in 2028.

The prime contractor on the ML-2 is Bechtel National, Inc., of Reston, Virginia. They are responsible for design, engineering, fabrication, testing, and quality control. The initial contract in June 2019 was for $383 million with delivery to NASA slated for March 2023. However, by August 2022 the contract had increased to more than $1 billion and delivery was pushed back to May 2026. In June of this year, NASA set a commitment to Congress for a total cost of $1.8 billion but has struggled to incentivize improvement in contractor performance or to develop a reliable cost and schedule.

The OIG estimate that Bechtel’s costs will continue to rise and the ML-2 will not be delivered to NASA until spring 2029, well beyond the scheduled launch date of Artemis IV. NASA disagrees with this analysis; however, the agency did not establish an Agency Baseline Commitment until June of this year and lacked a cost and schedule estimate before that. As a result, costs and schedule estimates have changed several times, making it difficult for NASA to identify its funding needs, to measure project and contractor performance, or to be accountable to Congress.

The OIG audit is an interesting read and is available at the link below.

FMI:  oig.nasa.gov/

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (02.09.25)

“We are very pleased to enter into this MoU agreement with Gogo, especially as we aim to offer our Airbus ACJ operators and business leaders the highest standard connectivity>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (02.09.25)

Aero Linx: Rhode Island Pilots Association (RIPA) The Rhode Island Pilots Association represents the GA community based at seven airports in the State of Rhode Island. Our mission >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 02.06.25: AeroEducate, Mil KingAirs, PilotWorkshops

Also: Lufthansa Dreamliner Sim, ATC Can't Quit, NBAA Leadership, Acting FAA Head ierra Space is becoming the newest content provider for EAA’s AeroEducate online resource and>[...]

Airborne 02.05.25: No Outs 4 ATC, Sporty's Acquires, 'Black' Boxes

Also: NOTAM System Restored, Textron Mil Trainers, Axiom Space, Police Rescues Cirrus Pax The Trump administration’s attempt at downsizing the federal workforce has run into >[...]

Airborne 02.03.25: Drone Pilot Bust, New Acting FAA Boss, PNE Lear Accident

Also: 2 Blimps For OSH, USCG-Airbus Deal, Japan Buys T-6s, Starliner Boss Replaced A 56-year-old California man recently pled guilty after he flew his drone into a Super Scooper fi>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC