Tue, Sep 03, 2024
Second Launcher Needed For Larger Variants Of Space Launch System
The NASA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted an audit to determine how the agency was meeting its cost, schedule, and performance goals, and the actions the agency has taken to control future cost increases and schedule delays.

NASA’s Artemis series of space missions will use the Space Launch System (SLS) super heavy lift vehicle to launch the Orion Crew module into space. The SLS booster rockets and Orion are vertically assembled into a single spacecraft on top of the mobile launch platform inside the Vehicle Assembly Building. When complete, the mobile launcher with the spacecraft on top is moved to the launch pad. NASA has one mobile launcher, ML-1, for initial Artemis launches. A second, larger one, ML-2, is needed to handle larger SLS variants starting with the Artemis IV launch in 2028.
The prime contractor on the ML-2 is Bechtel National, Inc., of Reston, Virginia. They are responsible for design, engineering, fabrication, testing, and quality control. The initial contract in June 2019 was for $383 million with delivery to NASA slated for March 2023. However, by August 2022 the contract had increased to more than $1 billion and delivery was pushed back to May 2026. In June of this year, NASA set a commitment to Congress for a total cost of $1.8 billion but has struggled to incentivize improvement in contractor performance or to develop a reliable cost and schedule.

The OIG estimate that Bechtel’s costs will continue to rise and the ML-2 will not be delivered to NASA until spring 2029, well beyond the scheduled launch date of Artemis IV. NASA disagrees with this analysis; however, the agency did not establish an Agency Baseline Commitment until June of this year and lacked a cost and schedule estimate before that. As a result, costs and schedule estimates have changed several times, making it difficult for NASA to identify its funding needs, to measure project and contractor performance, or to be accountable to Congress.
The OIG audit is an interesting read and is available at the link below.
More News
NonApproach Control Tower Authorizes aircraft to land or takeoff at the airport controlled by the tower or to transit the Class D airspace. The primary function of a nonapproach co>[...]
“This shutdown inflicted real damage. Beyond disrupting operations and adding risk into the aviation system… it hindered essential career growth opportunities and stal>[...]
Aero Linx: The Mooney Mite Site Dedicated to the Mooney M-18 Mite, "The Most Personal Airplane," and to supporting Mite owners everywhere. The Mooney M-18 Mite is a single-place, l>[...]
Pilot’s Improper Installation Of The Control Stick Pushrod Assemblies, Which Resulted In Separation Of The Left Pushrod And A Total Loss Of Roll Control Analysis: While retur>[...]
We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]