Shelby To Boeing: 'Take It Back!' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Fri, Oct 05, 2007

Shelby To Boeing: 'Take It Back!'

Alabama Senator Objects To Contention Alabama Is "Risky" Place To Build Military Aircraft

Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) has a bone to pick with Boeing.

In a letter to Boeing CEO James McNerney, the gentleman from Tuscaloosa says he's sharing his "disbelief and profound disappointment" at statements from Boeing representatives at a recent Air Force Association conference -- disparaging remarks about his home state.

Boeing is locked in a long-running, bitter competition with Northrop Grumman and EADS North America for a mammoth contract to build new refueling tankers for the USAF. The Northrop team proposes to build those aircraft in Mobile, AL, if it gets the contract.

Boeing representatives, who want that contract every bit as much as the Northrop team, say the USAF should be concerned about Alabama's lack of aircraft industries.

That makes Shelby hot under the collar. He tells AL.Com the Boeing remarks are "ignorant and unfounded."

After all, Sen. Shelby points out, Boeing itself employs 2,800 workers in the Huntsville area alone.

"What has changed in the last four years that has so drastically altered your perception?" Shelby writes in his letter to McNerney. "I would hope that you would disavow the offensive remarks about Mobile and that in the future you will ensure that your company avoids publicly demeaning Alabama's highly qualified workforce, including your own."

This is the sound of a Boeing spokesperson back-peddling: The remarks, he says, "were intended to describe the technical and schedule risk associated with setting up any new assembly operation versus using an existing and proven assembly line."

FMI: www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Capella Aircraft Corp FW1C50

Pilot Reported That He Was Unfamiliar With The Single Seat Amateur-Built Airplane And His Intent Was To Perform High-Speed Taxi Testing Analysis: The pilot reported that he was unf>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Timber Tiger Touts Curtiss Jenny Replicas

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): First Kits to Ship October 2023 Having formerly resurrected the storied shape of the Ryan ST—in effigy, anyway—Montrose, Colorado-based Tim>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.04.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC