FAA Tweaks New ETOPS Ruling | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Sat, Feb 17, 2007

FAA Tweaks New ETOPS Ruling

Allows "Dual Maintenance" In Limited Circumstances

They aren't big changes... but the FAA has already tweaked its ruling on Extended Operations (ETOPS) regulations for Part 121 and Part 135 turbine transport aircraft, one month after the original rule was published.

The changes -- none of which are substantive, in the FAA's words -- correct the rule language applicable to dual maintenance and formatting of a Part 1 definition and section of Appendix G. Following publication of the final rule, it was brought to the attention of the FAA the original intent of the concept of "dual maintenance" in the final rule did not codify existing FAA ETOPS guidance, as published in the notice of proposed rulemaking.

The amendment clarifies that language.

"Dual maintenance" is a concept relating to repetition of maintenance errors on redundant systems -- i.e., when one mechanic performs the same error while repairing two or more systems on the same aircraft. An example of dual maintenance error is failing to install o-rings on engine oil or fuel components on multiple engines.

Establishing procedures to avoid dual maintenance can minimize the probability of such errors. The use of two or more mechanics reduces the risk of this type of error. Routine tasks on multiple similar elements, such as oil and fuel filter changes, should never be scheduled and assigned on the same maintenance visit.

However, the FAA states, in some cases such procedures may be unavoidable. For instance, a pilot's report of a discrepancy on an ETOPS significant system may require maintenance on one engine, while a scheduled maintenance event is performed on the other engine.

In such cases, the certificate holder must establish and follow procedures to mitigate the risk of human error, according to the FAA's new language.

ETOPS regulations allow aircraft, other than an all-cargo operation in an airplane with more than two engines, to operate on one engine in the event of emergency within a time threshold identified in part 121 or part 135. That time threshold is determined using an approved one-engine-inoperative cruise speed under standard atmospheric conditions in still air.

FMI: Read The Amendment (.pdf)

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Aviat A1

Airplane Bounced About 3 Ft Then Touched Back Down And Then, With No Brakes Applied, The Airplane Began Veering To The Left Analysis: The pilot entered the airport traffic pattern >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.08.25)

Aero Linx: British Microlight Aircraft Association (BMAA) The primary focus within all aviation activity is SAFETY. In all aspects of our sport SAFETY must come first, whether it b>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Fly Corvair’s Reliable Engine Alternative

From SnF25 (YouTube Edition): William Wynne Builds Practical Aircraft Engines on the Corvair Platform Seeking an affordable alternative to the traditional aircraft engine options, >[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: CiES Fuel-Quantity and e-Throttle Systems Praised

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Bridge of CiES CiES Inc. is a Bend, Oregon-based designer and manufacturer of modular embedded aircraft systems and sensors. The company’s fuel-l>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC