NTSB Recommends Inclusion Of Bounced Landing Recovery Techniques | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Thu, Sep 08, 2005

NTSB Recommends Inclusion Of Bounced Landing Recovery Techniques

Should Be Included In Manuals Following 2004 Executive Airlines Accident

The NTSB has determined that the probable cause of the May 9, 2004 accident involving Executive Airlines, that crashed while landing at Luis Munoz Marin International Airport San Juan, Puerto Rico, was the captain's failure to execute proper techniques to recover from bounced landings and his subsequent failure to execute a go-around.

As a result of the accident, the Safety Board recommended that the Federal Aviation Administration require all airlines to incorporate bounced landing recovery techniques in their flight manuals and teach these techniques during initial and recurrent training.

On May 9, 2004, Executive Airlines, flight 5401, was doing business as an American Eagle flight from Mayaguez, Puerto Rico to San Juan, Puerto Rico. During the landing, the airplane bounced twice before coming to a complete stop on a grassy area about 217 feet from the runway 's centerline and about 4,317 feet beyond the runway. The captain was seriously injured.

The first officer, 2 flight attendants, and 16 of the 22 passengers received minor injuries. Damage to the aircraft was substantial.

During its investigation, the Safety Board also learned that the left aileron surface position data recorded by the accident airplane's flight data recorder was invalid even though the aircraft was modified on August 7, 2001 with position sensors and associated hardware required by a supplemental type certificate (STC).

The Safety Board issued two recommendations to the FAA that would require replacement of aileron sensors installed in accordance with the STC (ST01310NY) and call for a review of all FDR systems that have been modified by a STC to ensure that the sensors provide reliable data.

A synopsis of the report, including a complete list of the Conclusions and Recommendations, can be found on the Board's website.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Douglas A-4K

Pilot Applied Full Aft Stick And Nose-Up Trim, But The Airplane Remained On The Runway Analysis: The pilot reported that a preflight inspection and flight control checks revealed n>[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: PBY Catalina--From Wartime to Double Sunrise to the Long Sunset

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Before They’re All Gone... Humankind has been messing about in airplanes for almost 120-years. In that time, thousands of aircraft representing i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.01.25): Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) A transportation system that transports people and property by air between two points in the NAS using aircraft with advanced technologies, including el>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.01.25)

Aero Linx: MQ-1B Predator The MQ-1B Predator is an armed, multi-mission, medium-altitude, long-endurance remotely piloted aircraft that is employed primarily as an intelligence-col>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC