FAA Removes SID Chart Obstacle Notes To Cut Clutter | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.10.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.07.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Aug 15, 2017

FAA Removes SID Chart Obstacle Notes To Cut Clutter

Changes Effective With The August 17 Charting Cycle

With the Aug. 17 charting cycle, pilots will find revised SID charts easier to read because the FAA is removing the takeoff obstacle notes from them.

The obstacles are still there, said Rich Boll, chair of the Airspace, Air Traffic, and Flight Technology Working Group of NBAA’s Access Committee. “If these obstacles are a factor on departure, pilots will find the necessary information in the Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle Departure Procedure section, which are located on the front of the government charts and on the back of Jeppesen’s 10-9 airport chart.”

In 2015, NBAA requested the removal of the SID obstacle notes at a semi-annual meeting of the Aeronautical Charting Forum, in which industry provides input to the FAA on charting and the design of instrument procedures, said Boll, one of NBAA’s principal representatives.

“Several years ago, the FAA started charting obstacles located within a mile of the departure end of the runway, and which require a higher-than-standard climb gradient to a height not greater than 200 feet above the elevation of the departure end of the runway, in lieu of publishing the higher climb gradient,” he said.

In recent years, improved surveys steadily increased the number of obstacles being charted, consuming much of the available white space on the charts, which made it harder comprehend the SID.

“On government charts, some procedures often needed another page to list them all,” said Boll. “It was a white-space issue. The charts became cluttered to the point that pilots would ignore the obstacle data,” because at larger airports, they were rarely a factor, given the takeoff field length.

The obstacle data “is more critical to lower-performance aircraft, such piston singles and twins,” Boll explained. “It depends on the takeoff distance needed to reach 50 feet.” Because this information was already provided elsewhere, there was no reason to include it on the SIDs.

(Source: NBAA news release. Image provided)

FMI: www.nbaa.org, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Bob Hoover At Airventure -- Flight Test and Military Service

From 2011 (YouTube Edition): Aviation's Greatest Living Legend Talks About His Life In Aviation (Part 5, Final) ANN is pleased to offer you yet another snippet from the public conv>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.12.25)

“All Air Traffic Controllers must get back to work, NOW!!! Anyone who doesn’t will be substantially ‘docked. For those Air Traffic Controllers who were GREAT PATR>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.12.25)

Aero Linx: American Navion Society Welcome to the American Navion Society. Your society is here to support the Navion community. We are your source of technical and operating infor>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.12.25): Glideslope Intercept Altitude

Glideslope Intercept Altitude The published minimum altitude to intercept the glideslope in the intermediate segment of an instrument approach. Government charts use the lightning >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC