NBAA Welcomes FAA Ruling Against Burbank Airport Curfew | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Thu, Nov 05, 2009

NBAA Welcomes FAA Ruling Against Burbank Airport Curfew

Agency's Decision Cites Points Raised By NBAA, Preserves Access At Airport

The NBAA Wednesday welcomed a recent decision from the FAA denying a proposed ban on nighttime operations at Bob Hope Airport (BUR) in Burbank, California.

NBAA President and CEO Ed Bolen (pictured) applauded the decision from the FAA. "Access to our national network of community airports is at the cornerstone of the mobility and efficiency that are at the heart of business aviation," Bolen said. "When businesses aviation access is preserved at airports, it's also a win for nearby communities, which benefit from the jobs, investment and economic activity that are created. We applaud the FAA for this decision and will continue to work to preserve business aviation operations at Burbank and other public-use airports nationwide."

Earlier this year, the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority, owner and operator of the airport, filed an application under Part 161 of the FAA's regulations seeking permission to impose a nighttime curfew on all operations at Bob Hope Airport. Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 161 and the Airport Noise and Capacity Act require that airport proprietors examine the impacts of a proposed noise or access restriction within an "airport noise study area" when determining whether such curfews can be adopted.

Following a careful analysis of the Airport Authority's proposal, the FAA ruled on October 30 that the application fulfilled only two of six statutory requirements that must be met by an applicant in order to obtain the agency's approval for the proposed curfew. The FAA's 42-page document called the authority's proposal "unreasonable," in part because airport authority officials did not demonstrate that aviation activity would create a future noise problem. The ruling also noted that the curfew would hinder commerce and worsen congestion elsewhere in the Los Angeles area.

NBAA submitted an extensive legal filing in opposition to the curfew proposal, and representatives with the Association's Member Companies likewise submitted comments opposing the proposal. The documents were cited by the FAA in support of its decision.

FMI: www.nbaa.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, Nat’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

Klyde Morris (06.30.25)

What Goes Around, May Yet Come Back Around, Klyde FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC