Alabama Supreme Court Tosses Lawsuit Suit Stemming From 2005 Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sun, Jul 21, 2013

Alabama Supreme Court Tosses Lawsuit Suit Stemming From 2005 Accident

Said Accident, Which Occurred in Oklahoma, Happened Too Long Ago

The Alabama Supreme Court says that Teledyne Continental Motors has waited too long to try to recover legal fees and court costs from the manufacturer of an engine component that was implicated in an accident which fatally injured three people.

The three fatally injured were Harland Brent Stonecipher, who was employed as a pilot by Pre-Paid Legal Services, now known as LegalShield; his wife Tina and his 11-year-old daughter Nicole. The NTSB found in its probable cause report that the Cessna 310 Stonecipher was flying suffered a loss of engine power as a result of a fatigue fracture in one of the crankshaft gear teeth for undetermined reasons. Also causal was the pilot's failure to maintain control of the twin-engine airplane after the power loss, which resulted in an inadvertent stall and subsequent collision with terrain.

Continental at the time tried to recreate the manufacturing process that could have led to the failure of the gear, but was unable to do so. The NTSB said the cause of the gear tooth failure could not be determined. The company eventually settled the first lawsuit brought in 2007.

The Insurance Journal reports that Continental sued the company which manufactured the crankshaft that failed in 2011, saying the part did not meet its specifications. A judge initially ruled that Alabama's two-year statute of limitations did not apply, using the standard of six years for contract claims.

But this week, the Alabama Supreme Court disagreed, saying the two-year limit should apply, and dismissed the case. Continental had no comment on the ruling.

FMI: http://judicial.alabama.gov/supreme.cfm

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.18.25)

“Setting eight speed records this quickly following its August entry into service is a powerful testament to the tremendous capabilities of this aircraft. We are already seei>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.18.25): On-Course Indication

On-Course Indication An indication on an instrument, which provides the pilot a visual means of determining that the aircraft is located on the centerline of a given navigational t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.18.25)

Aero Linx: WW1 Aeroplanes, Inc. WORLD WAR 1 AEROPLANES was founded by Leo Opdycke in 1961 and incorporated as a federally recognized 501 (c) (3) not-for-profit corporation in 1979,>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Shoemaker Ronald R Pazmany PL-2

Pilot Reported That He Purchased The Airplane Earlier That Day Analysis: The pilot reported that he purchased the airplane earlier that day and completed a condition inspection tha>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 11.18.25: Dream Chaser Preps, Joby eTurbine, UAE Flt Test

Also: Abu Dhabi’s 1st Vertiport Network, Anduril-EDGE Partner, Vertical Permit/eVTOL Regs Sierra Space’s Dream Chaser spaceplane has cleared another round of pre-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC