Flight-100 FAA Authorization Proposal Charts New Century Of
Safer, More Efficient Aviation
US SecTrans Norman Y. Mineta has
now submitted to the Congress the Bush Administration’s
four-year aviation reauthorization proposal. The Centennial of
Flight Aviation Authorization Act (Flight-100) provides a
substantial investment in safety research, air traffic control
modernization, airport infrastructure improvements and
environmental initiatives.
"Flight-100 will help increase capacity and efficiency
throughout our aviation system while improving the existing
environmental review process," Secretary Mineta said. "The
Bush Administration looks forward to working closely with the
Congress on timely passage of this bill as we continue to improve
the safest aviation system in the world."
Flight-100 will further ensure the highest-affordable levels of
safety throughout the aviation system by continuing to fund
important infrastructure improvements and improving the FAA’s
research and development program. The proposal provides $2.9
billion in FY 2004 for FAA facilities and equipment, rising to $3.1
billion by 2007. "To improve efficiency," the agency would
receive $7.5 billion in FY 2004 for operations and maintenance, a 7
percent increase over the FY 2003 budget request. These funds
support implementation of the FAA's Operational Evolution Plan, the
acceleration of airspace redesign and future air traffic controller
staffing needs.
The proposal includes $100 million for safety research,
engineering and development in FY 2004. Flight-100 also improves
safety oversight of operators, repair stations and others, while
tightening enforcement of the FAA’s stringent safety and
maintenance regulations.
"In this centennial year of flight, the Administration’s
authorization proposal delivers a blueprint to prepare for the
needs of aviation’s future," said FAA Administrator Marion C.
Blakey. "We must continue to set the highest standard for
safe, efficient air travel through the industry’s inevitable
recovery and change."
In
addressing future industry capacity and efficiency requirements,
Flight-100 calls for an Airport Improvement Program (AIP)
investment of $3.4 billion each year over the entire term of the
reauthorization. If enacted, the reauthorization would
restructure AIP formulas and set-asides to allow more funds to be
targeted to airports with the greatest need and dependence on
federal assistance. Such restructuring would transfer more
than $87 million in FY 2004 funds from large to small airports,
thereby raising small airports’ share from approximately 63
percent to over 66 percent of total AIP grants. The proposal
also increases the amount of discretionary funding from 34 percent
to 46 percent of the AIP program, allowing FAA to target those
projects that serve national objectives and achieve the greatest
system benefits regardless of airport size.
The Administration’s proposal builds on President
Bush’s executive order to streamline environmental review
processes by proposing a number of noise and air quality
initiatives to reduce the most significant aviation environmental
impacts. For example, the proposal makes more flexible use of
the AIP noise set-asides to accelerate research designed to reduce
aircraft noise and emissions. The authorization proposal also
funds noise mitigation efforts to lessen the impacts of airport
expansion and funds grants to state and local governments to make
land uses adjacent to large and medium-sized airports more
compatible with airport operations. In addition, Flight-100
allows the FAA to designate aviation safety projects for expedited
streamlined environmental review.
Finally,
Flight-100 would implement major revisions to the Essential Air
Service (EAS) Program creating an Essential Transportation Service
(ETS) Program that will provide more efficient management and
better tailor the service to the needs of specific
communities. With the proposed reforms, the department would
be able to ensure that the small communities that need it the most,
maintain access to the national air transportation system. To
encourage community participation and support of its subsidized
service, the proposal requires communities to contribute either 10
or 25 percent of the total subsidy required depending on their
degree of isolation.