NASA: Back to the Sixties? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-
10.14.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.15.25

Airborne-NextGen-10.16.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Fri, Sep 19, 2003

NASA: Back to the Sixties?

'Capsule' Re-Entry Vehicles Will Push Space Technology 'Back' Ten Years

The next generation of re-entry vehicles NASA uses may look and act a lot like previous iterations. NASA is seriously considering returning to "capsule" technology, leapfrogging backwards over the 1970s-era Shuttle design.

A Reuters report says that, since Columbia's loss February 1, more and more in, and close to the space program, as well as a growing group in congress, are thinking out loud that capsules may be the way to come home, for a decade or more. Winged transport is losing favor.

Add to that, the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) report that urged NASA to get on with whatever they're going to use, to replace the generation-old Shuttles.

NASA has developed procedures for an inflight patch kit, so that repairs to damage similar to Columbia's could be made during a mission; the agency admits, though, that it might not be copmprehensive-enough to have repaired the extensive damage the last shuttle suffered, as a piece of foam breached the wing's protective outer zone on takeoff.

No shuttle launches are scheduled until next Summer.

Could the current shuttle fleet continue to do the job? Not if NASA is to go much beyond the roughly 250-mile high orbit of the International Space Station. A current-technology shuttle would never survive a re-entry from a great distance -- like another moon shot.

So... does the next 'shuttle' have to have wings? NASA spokesman Bob Jacobs said this week, "We haven’t spelled out that it has to glide back to Earth and land like a plane. That’s not a requirement."

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.15.25: Phantom 3500 Confounds, Citation CJ3 Gen2 TC, True Blue Power

Also: Kodiak 100 Joins USFS, Innovative Solutions & Support Renamed, Gulfstream Selects Honeywell, Special Olympics Airlift The Phantom 3500 mockup made an appearance where the>[...]

Airborne 10.14.25: Laser Threat, VeriJet BK, Duffy Threatens Problem Controllers

Also: USAF Pilots, Atlanta Tower Evac, Archer Spotlight Dissipates, Hop-A-Jet Sues A social-media call for people to point lasers at aircraft flying over Portland’s ICE facil>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.20.25)

“We developed this prototype from concept to reality in under a year. The U-Hawk continues the Black Hawk legacy of being the world’s premier utility aircraft and opens>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.20.25): Flameout Pattern

Flameout Pattern An approach normally conducted by a single-engine military aircraft experiencing loss or anticipating loss of engine power or control. The standard overhead approa>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Schweizer SGS 2-33A

Student Pilot’s Failure To Maintain Airspeed And Altitude Resulting In A Collision With The Ground During The Base To Final Turn Analysis: The solo student pilot reported she>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC