NASA: Back to the Sixties? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Fri, Sep 19, 2003

NASA: Back to the Sixties?

'Capsule' Re-Entry Vehicles Will Push Space Technology 'Back' Ten Years

The next generation of re-entry vehicles NASA uses may look and act a lot like previous iterations. NASA is seriously considering returning to "capsule" technology, leapfrogging backwards over the 1970s-era Shuttle design.

A Reuters report says that, since Columbia's loss February 1, more and more in, and close to the space program, as well as a growing group in congress, are thinking out loud that capsules may be the way to come home, for a decade or more. Winged transport is losing favor.

Add to that, the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) report that urged NASA to get on with whatever they're going to use, to replace the generation-old Shuttles.

NASA has developed procedures for an inflight patch kit, so that repairs to damage similar to Columbia's could be made during a mission; the agency admits, though, that it might not be copmprehensive-enough to have repaired the extensive damage the last shuttle suffered, as a piece of foam breached the wing's protective outer zone on takeoff.

No shuttle launches are scheduled until next Summer.

Could the current shuttle fleet continue to do the job? Not if NASA is to go much beyond the roughly 250-mile high orbit of the International Space Station. A current-technology shuttle would never survive a re-entry from a great distance -- like another moon shot.

So... does the next 'shuttle' have to have wings? NASA spokesman Bob Jacobs said this week, "We haven’t spelled out that it has to glide back to Earth and land like a plane. That’s not a requirement."

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.25): Circle To Runway (Runway Number)

Circle To Runway (Runway Number) Used by ATC to inform the pilot that he/she must circle to land because the runway in use is other than the runway aligned with the instrument appr>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.05.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: De Havilland DHC-1

At Altitude Of About 250-300 Ft Agl, The Airplane Experienced A Total Loss Of Engine Power On November 6, 2024, at 1600 central standard time, a De Havilland DHC-1, N420TD, was inv>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Boeing Dreamliner -- Historic First Flight Coverage

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Three Hour Flight Was 'Flawless' -- At Least, Until Mother Nature Intervened For anyone who loves the aviation business, this was a VERY good day. Afte>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.06.25: AF Uncrewed Fighters, Drones v Planes, Joby Crew Test

Also: AMA Names Tyler Dobbs, More Falcon 9 Ops, Firefly Launch Unsuccessful, Autonomous F-16s The Air Force has begun ground testing a future uncrewed jet design in a milestone tow>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC