Experts: Impossible To Determine If Aberdeen Super Puma Accident Was Preventable | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.19.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.21.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.23.25

Fri, Jan 31, 2014

Experts: Impossible To Determine If Aberdeen Super Puma Accident Was Preventable

Gearbox Pieces Critical To Investigation Never Recovered From The Ocean Floor

It may be impossible to determine if an accident in 2009 that resulted in 16 fatalities in the North Sea was preventable, according to an inquiry being conducted in Aberdeen, Scotland.

The accident occurred when the main rotor gearbox on a Super Puma aircraft reportedly failed during flight and the aircraft went down in the water. But divers were unable to recover a critical piece, a gear that may have failed, from the ocean floor.

The Evening Express newspaper reports that the accident inquiry board was told that without that critical part, it is likely impossible to know if the accident was preventable. AAIB inspector Mark Jarvis said that because "we fully don't understand the failure mode," he could not say with certainty that the accident was avoidable.

But after inspecting what was recovered from the seabed, Jarvis said “What we do know is that if the gearbox had been removed from service and sent to the manufacturer then during their overhaul procedure this gearbox would have been rejected.”

He said there was evidence of spalling, or metal-on-metal contact, in the recovered gearbox, but there was not the usual amount of debris that would normally be found in such a situation.

An attorney for Airbus Helicopters (formerly Eurocopter) which made the Super Puma said that it was unlikely that the gear failed, because if it had been defective, that would have shown up in previous inspections. But Jarvis said that, as unlikely as that may be, "the possibility remains it … may have contributed to this accident.”

FMI: www.aaib.gov.uk

Advertisement

More News

Oshkosh Memories: An Aero-News Stringer Perspective

From 2021: The Inside Skinny On What Being An ANN Oshkosh Stringer Is All About By ANN Senior Stringer Extraordinare, Gene Yarbrough The annual gathering at Oshkosh is a right of p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA32RT

Video Showed That During The Takeoff, The Nose Baggage Door Was Open On May 10, 2025, about 0935 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-32RT-300, N30689, was destroyed when it was invol>[...]

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.28.25)

"I think what is key, we have offered a bonus to air traffic controllers who are eligible to retire. We are going to pay them a 20% bonus on their salary to stay longer. Don't reti>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.28.25): Pilot Briefing

Aero Linx: Pilot Briefing The gathering, translation, interpretation, and summarization of weather and aeronautical information into a form usable by the pilot or flight supervisor>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC