ALPA Pilots Touch Down In D.C. For 'Deny NAI' Day Of Action | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.06.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.08.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-10.09.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.10.25

Thu, Nov 20, 2014

ALPA Pilots Touch Down In D.C. For 'Deny NAI' Day Of Action

Airline Workers Underscore Sweeping Opposition To 'Flag-Of-Convenience' Business Model

Scores of Air Line Pilots Association, Int’l (ALPA) pilots converged on Capitol Hill Wednesday to draw attention on the overwhelming opposition across the airline industry and in Congress to Norwegian Air International’s (NAI) foreign air carrier permit application.

“U.S. and legitimate EU airlines play by the rules in the global marketplace—that’s fair competition,” said Capt. Lee Moak (pictured), ALPA’s president. “Conversely, NAI’s model to skirt employment and tax laws is a direct attack on the fair market. The airline pilots streaming across Capitol Hill today are making clear their strong objection to this business model.”

Today’s event, which included ALPA pilots who fly for mainline, cargo, and regional airlines, is the latest action in the union’s work to underscore the threat to fair competition posed by NAI’s model and to catalogue the broad opposition to the company’s permit application. Nearly 35,000 U.S. airline industry supporters have signed ALPA’s petition in opposition to NAI’s application.

On November 15, the union, together with Delta Air Lines, launched the latest advance in its “Deny NAI” advertising campaign, including new radio spots, banner ads on Capitol Hill newspaper websites, and Navy Yard-Ballpark Washington, D.C., Metro station billboards.

In addition, ALPA released a new whiteboard video, which details the facts and figures behind NAI’s unfair business model. The union has also recently kicked off #FinishTheJob, a social media campaign through which airline workers and passengers across the country have urged congressional leaders to join the ranks of 150 of their colleagues who have spoken out against NAI.

On November 12, Capt. Moak sent a letter to the Senate Appropriations Committee urging its members to support legislation already passed in the U.S. House that requires the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to follow the law and the provisions of the EU-U.S. Open Skies agreement when evaluating NAI’s permit request.

“The U.S. maritime industry has seen the adverse effects of flag-of-convenience business practices where companies register merchant ships in a foreign state to avoid their own country’s regulation, taxes, and labor codes,” said Capt. Moak. “The precedent proposed by NAI threatens the U.S. airline industry and our jobs.”

NAI’s flag-of-convenience business model seeks to undercut U.S. airlines by using an air operator certificate from Ireland, a country to which it doesn’t fly. NAI’s business plan would then take advantage of Ireland’s relaxed employment laws to employ outsourced foreign-domiciled workers contracted from a separate employer at wage and benefit levels substantially lower than if it operated as a Norwegian airline headquartered in Norway. In September, the U.S. DOT dismissed NAI’s exemption request but has not yet made a decision on the foreign air carrier permit application to operate to and from the United States.

The EU-U.S. Open Skies agreement was designed to deter European airlines from shopping different countries in which to do business with the goal of obtaining lower labor costs. A specific provision (Article 17 bis) was included in the agreement to prevent business models such as NAI’s that seek to use opportunities under the agreement expressly to lower labor standards.

In addition to conflicting with the EU-U.S. Open Skies agreement, the NAI business model also raises a key safety issue. “We simply don’t know how safety oversight and surveillance of NAI’s flights would be conducted,” said Capt. Moak, explaining that, because the International Civil Aviation Organization has not yet established minimum standards and procedures for oversight and surveillance of a business model such as NAI’s, its plan is uncharted territory as far as ensuring safety.

“Passengers expect, and our industry demands, that airlines abide by U.S. law and policy, employ experienced pilots and crewmembers, and operate under robust government oversight to ensure safety,” said Capt. Moak. “DOT must deny NAI a U.S. foreign air carrier permit.”

FMI: www.alpa.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.14.25: Laser Threat, VeriJet BK, Duffy Threatens Problem Controllers

Also: USAF Pilots, Atlanta Tower Evac, Archer Spotlight Dissipates, Hop-A-Jet Sues A social-media call for people to point lasers at aircraft flying over Portland’s ICE facil>[...]

Airborne 10.15.25: Phantom 3500 Confounds, Citation CJ3 Gen2 TC, True Blue Power

Also: Kodiak 100 Joins USFS, Innovative Solutions & Support Renamed, Gulfstream Selects Honeywell, Special Olympics Airlift The Phantom 3500 mockup made an appearance where the>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.17.25)

"On the way back to the United States from NATO’s Defense Ministers meeting, Secretary of War Hegseth’s plane made an unscheduled landing in the United Kingdom due to a>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-28-180

Pilot Was Transporting His Family Back To Their Home In Boise And He Planned To Fly Back To SHR That Afternoon On September 1, 2025 about 1612 mountain daylight time, a Piper PA-28>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC