Report: TSA Screeners Failed To Detect Explosives | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.10.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.12.24 Airborne-FltTraining-06.13.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.14.24

Mon, Mar 20, 2006

Report: TSA Screeners Failed To Detect Explosives

GAO Says 21 Airports Tested... All Fail

Investigators who conducted secret tests of baggage screeners at nearly two dozen airports made a disturbing -- but perhaps not surprising -- find: according to a GAO report, all of the workers failed to detect bomb-making components and explosives hidden in luggage.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) conducted the clandestine review of airport security throughout the country. News reports indicate bomb making materials were passed through Transportation Security Administration passenger screening at 21 airports, without being detected.

"The fact that government investigators were able to pass through TSA's screening at 21 major airports with bomb making materials is frightening," said Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS), Ranking Member of the Committee on Homeland Security, in a release by House Democrats.

"It's like the story of the Trojan Horse," Thompson added. "TSA has spent so much time telling people to take off their shoes and belts, that they have missed the bomb making materials."

The actual report, first reported by NBC News, remains classified. Which airports were tested is also unknown.

Despite evidence that at least some screeners are ineffective at what could be deemed their primary purpose, Homeland Security Assistant Secretary and TSA Chief Edmund "Kip" Hawley didn't argue with the apparent findings in the report -- nor did he seem particularly concerned.

While calling the report "interesting," and helpful, Hawley added it is "not at all an evaluation of the entire system. It's a data point on that one particular thing."

Hawley said the report doesn't take into account the levels of security that occur before passengers go through screening -- and once they're through. That includes checks of travelers' names against federal watch lists and behavioral analyses.

"This should not be an alarming report," Hawley said a briefing.

FMI: www.tsa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANNouncement: Now Accepting Applications For Oshkosh 2024 Stringers!!!

An Amazing Experience Awaits The Chosen Few... Oshkosh, to us, seems the perfect place to get started on watching aviation recover the past couple of years... and so ANN is putting>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.13.24)

“NBAA has a tremendous responsibility to the business aviation industry, and we are constantly collaborating with them. Our flight departments, professionals and aircraft own>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.13.24): Dead Reckoning

Dead Reckoning Dead reckoning, as applied to flying, is the navigation of an airplane solely by means of computations based on airspeed, course, heading, wind direction, and speed,>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.13.24)

Aero Linx: Vertical Aviation Safety Team (VAST) We are a public–private initiative to enhance worldwide flight operations safety in all segments of the vertical flight indust>[...]

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC