Tue, Jun 04, 2024
Improper Repair Of A (Canopy) Crack By Maintenance Personnel...
Location: Woodstock, Virginia Accident Number: ERA23LA013
Date & Time: October 8, 2022, 09:50 Local Registration: N520RJ
Aircraft: Schempp-Hirth Discus CS Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Defining Event: Part(s) separation from AC Injuries: 1 None
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

Analysis: The pilot reported that the glider was at 3,700 ft mean sea level when the canopy suddenly, without warning, separated from the glider. He subsequently landed uneventfully at his intended destination airport.
Review of maintenance records revealed that about 2 years before the accident, a maintenance facility stop-drilled a hole to correct a canopy crack at the rear hinge along the glide frame. Metallurgical examination revealed that the drilled hole appeared to halt progression of the original crack along its initial propagation direction. However, both the new primary separation crack and a secondary crack propagated from the hole in diametrically opposite directions, which suggests they likely developed due to a stress state along the same plane. Additionally, both cracks propagated from internal surface corners of the hole, indicating the corners likely acted as stress risers that facilitated crack initiation.
There was no approved method from the glider manufacturer to stop-drill a hole in plexiglass; however, manufacturer approval was not required as the glider was registered in the experimental category. The glider manufacturer stated that it was common practice for cracks in the plexiglass to be drilled-out to stop the crack progression as a temporary solution; however, for a proper repair, the canopy must be removed and re-glued.
The presence of multiple cracks propagating out of the same stress riser of the internal hole corner indicated that the specific hole drilled did not prevent subsequent progression of further cracking and the eventual separation of the canopy.
Probable Cause and Findings: The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be -- Improper repair of a crack by maintenance personnel, which resulted in a subsequent failure of the glider canopy.
More News
He Attempted To Restart The Engine Three Times. On The Third Restart Attempt, He Noticed That Flames Were Coming Out From The Right Wing Near The Fuel Cap Analysis: The pilot repor>[...]
Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]
From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Leading Air Show Performers Give Their Best Advice for Newcomers On December 6th through December 9th, the Paris Las Vegas Hotel hosted over 1,500 air >[...]
Aero Linx: NASA ASRS ASRS captures confidential reports, analyzes the resulting aviation safety data, and disseminates vital information to the aviation community. The ASRS is an i>[...]
“For our inaugural Pylon Racing Seminar in Roswell, we were thrilled to certify 60 pilots across our six closed-course pylon race classes. Not only did this year’s PRS >[...]