NTSB Knocks Boeing, FAA for Preventable Door Blowout | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Fri, Jun 27, 2025

NTSB Knocks Boeing, FAA for Preventable Door Blowout

Investigators Say the Incident ‘Never Should Have Happened’

The National Transportation Safety Board has published its findings on an incident in 2024 involving a door panel flying off of an Alaska Airlines B737 MAX 9. Investigators all seem to agree that the event was completely preventable, citing poor training at Boeing and insufficient FAA oversight.

The incident involved a door panel detaching mid-flight, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage but, miraculously, no injuries. Faulting both the FAA and Boeing for overlooking multiple red flags, NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy was not scared to say that the accident “never should have happened” during a recent public hearing.

The NTSB explained that Boeing lacked structured training for workers tasked with removing and reinstalling door plugs, which are critical components to cabin pressurization. Instead, employees learned through informal, on-the-job methods. Investigators also found Boeing’s work documentation process to be flawed, with no clear record of who performed maintenance on the failed aircraft.

Meanwhile, the FAA was criticized for ineffective audits, oversight gaps, and a failure to detect or correct Boeing’s quality control lapses. Homendy added that she had “lots of questions about where the FAA was during all of this.”

The NTSB recommended improvements to Boeing’s training and documentation systems. While these comments cannot be enforced, Boeing and fuselage supplier Spirit AeroSystems have already begun implementing changes, including a new door plug retention system. This is now undergoing FAA certification.

The FAA responded by noting it has since increased its on-site presence at Boeing facilities, capped 737 MAX production, and required more audits and inspections. But even former FAA leadership admitted the agency had been “too hands off” in its regulatory role.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 07.11.25: New FAA Boss, New NASA Boss (Kinda), WB57s Over TX

Also: ANOTHER Illegal Drone, KidVenture Educational Activities, Record Launches, TSA v Shoes The Senate confirmed Bryan Bedford to become the next Administrator of the FAA, in a ne>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 07.10.25: ATC School, Air Race Classic, Samson School

Also: Sully v Bedford, Embraer Scholarships, NORAD Intercepts 11, GAMA Thankful Middle Georgia State University will be joining the Federal Aviation Administration’s fight ag>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 07.03.25: Sonex HW, BlackShape Gabriel, PRA Fly-In 25

Also: DarkAero Update, Electric Aircraft Symposium, Updated Instructor Guide, OSH Homebuilts Celebrate The long-awaited Sonex High Wing prototype has flown... the Sonex gang tells >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 07.10.25: ATC School, Air Race Classic, Samson School

Also: Sully v Bedford, Embraer Scholarships, NORAD Intercepts 11, GAMA Thankful Middle Georgia State University will be joining the Federal Aviation Administration’s fight ag>[...]

Rick Kenin New Board Chair of VAI

30-Year USCG Veteran Aviator Focusing On Member Benefits The Vertical Aviation International Board of Directors announced its new leadership officers in April, and all began their >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC