ERA Slams European Commission | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.27.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.28.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.29.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.30.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Sat, Jul 12, 2003

ERA Slams European Commission

Says EU Rules Lack Business Sense

The head of the European Regions Airline Association (ERA) slammed the European Commission Friday for what it calls a failure to apply basic business-like practices when drafting legislative proposals.  Mike Ambrose, director general of the ERA, said that's resulted in billions of Euros in unnecessary costs for an airline industry still deep in crisis and fighting further job losses after the September 11th attacks on America.

Speaking to the Director's General Civil Aviation of ECAC (European Civil Aviation Conference) at their triennial meeting this week, Ambrose called for cost reductions by the bodies that provide Europe’s air navigation services and for a moratorium on all regulatory proposals which add cost burdens to airlines.

"Had the Commission performed a business impact assessment before drafting the proposed legislation on compensation and assistance for air passengers, it would have been obvious that the problems encountered by European air passengers when flights are cancelled or delayed did not warrant a EUR 2 billion solution," said Ambrose.

Still Vague

Despite over 150 changes made by the European Parliament and the European Union Council of Transport Ministers, much of the ill-considered draft proposal remains ambiguous, unclear in its intentions and strikes a poor balance between the interests of the vast majority of passengers who have trouble-free journeys and those whose journeys are disrupted.

“The EC has an obligation to ensure that any regulation is justified by an actual requirement and is accompanied by an impact assessment. Had such an approach been adopted prior to the development of the Passenger Compensation and Assistance proposals, the resultant draft regulation would not have been such an indescribable jumble of ill-considered ideas", said Ambrose.

FMI: www.eraa.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.31.25): Minimum Sector Altitude [ICAO]

Minimum Sector Altitude The lowest altitude which may be used under emergency conditions which will provide a minimum clearance of 300 m (1,000 feet) above all obstacles located in>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.31.25)

Aero Linx: African Civil Aviation Commission (AFCAC) At AFCAC, our Safety Strategic Objective is to enhance Aviation Safety and the efficiency of Air Navigation Services in Africa.>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Airbus A321-271N (A1); Cessna 172N (A2)

The Local Controller’s Poor Judgment In Prioritization Of Their Ground Traffic Ahead Of Their Airborne Traffic Analysis: Hawaiian Airlines flight 70 (HAL70), N2165HA, an Airb>[...]

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Airborne 10.30.25: Earhart Search, SpaceX Speed Limit, Welcome Back, Xyla!

Also: Beech M-346N, Metro Gains H160 EMS STC, New Bell Boss, Affordable Flying Expo Tickets NOW On Sale! Purdue University’s Research Foundation and the Archaeological Legacy>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC