Lewiston, ME Immune From Lawsuit In Plane Crash Involving Students | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Mon, Jun 07, 2010

Lewiston, ME Immune From Lawsuit In Plane Crash Involving Students

High Court Determines City Is Not Responsible For Actions Of Contractor

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that the city of Lewiston is immune from a lawsuit stemming from an airplane accident in which three high school students were fatally injured.

The accident occurred in 2006 during a summer camp for students in the Lewiston High School Junior ROTC program. The three students were participating in an orientation flight when it impacted terrain on Barker Mountain, killing the students and the pilot. The NTSB determined the probable cause of the accident was pilot error, and another student who had flown with the pilot said he had a history of "showing off" and performing dangerous maneuvers.

Maine Public Broadcasting reports that the families of the students reached settlements with Twin Cities Air Services, which owned the airplane and provided the pilot. But they had also filed a wrongful death suit against the school district and the city, contending that they had knowledge that the situation would be dangerous and did not act on that knowledge.

The city argued that Twin Cities Air Services made the choice of pilot, and that flying the airplanes was the company's responsibility, but a superior court judge ruled last year that the city was not immune from the suit despite a Maine law that does not hold government entities responsible for the actions of independent contractors.

The Main Supreme Judicial Court's 4-3 decision agrees with the city of Lewiston that it is immune under the Tort Claims Act. But in the dissent, three justices said that the immunity should not apply because the city was "using" the airplane when the accident occurred.

FMI: www.courts.state.me.us/maine_courts/supreme/index.shtml

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.09.24)

"Fly-by-wire flight, coupled with additional capability that are being integrated into ALFA, provide a great foundation for Bell to expand on its autonomous capabilities. This airc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.24)

Aero Linx: B-21 Raider The B-21 Raider will be a dual-capable penetrating strike stealth bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. The B-21 will form th>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC