Missile Defense Contract Goes to Boeing, Raytheon | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jan 29, 2003

Missile Defense Contract Goes to Boeing, Raytheon

$¾ Billion: What Do They Know?

With the only countries that are both able and willing to mount a missile attack against the US sharing a border in far east Asia, the Pentagon's huge contract for "floating radar" may seem like overkill; but it's supposed to be operational in record time -- by Fall of 2005.

The concept -- using X-band radar units in the oceans to track incoming missiles and help coordinate countermeasures -- is old, and neglected, at least since the Soviet Union collapsed; but the size of the commitment, and the rapidity of the fulfillment, should raise eyebrows throughout the world's political and defense communities.

Raytheon and Boeing are to share the contract, producing the infrastructure as well as the X-band radar units. Whether the units will include dedicated ships, or be mounted in barges and towed around, has not been specified; the ultimate design will surely affect how the money is to be spent.

The Pentagon is not acknowledging any link between this program and the spotty performance of anti-missile tests, the latest of which was a the third failure in eight tests, in December.

Raytheon will supply most of the electronics; Boeing is looking to build the booster, with both Lockheed Martin and Orbital vying to supply the rocket motors.

Reuters reports that, "The plans call for an initial U.S. system with 16 interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska, and four at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California by 2005." This seems to indicate that the Pentagon is looking across the Pacific, for the likeliest threat.

FMI: www.dod.gov; www.raytheon.com; www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Rutan Long-EZ

The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.05.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.05.25)

"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC