Airlines For America Calls Senate FAA Reauthorization Bill An 'Overreach' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Mar 11, 2016

Airlines For America Calls Senate FAA Reauthorization Bill An 'Overreach'

Says Bill Goes Too Far In Efforts To Reregulate Airline Pricing And Service, Misses Historic Opportunity To Improve Air Travel For Customers, Rightfully Rejects Tax Hikes On Travel

Airlines for America (A4A) says there are multiple problems with legislation introduced by Sens. John Thune (R-SD) and Bill Nelson (D-FL) to reauthorize the FAA, but does see some positives in the bill.

In a statement, A4A says the bill goes too far in its attempt to reregulate airlines. The Senate bill seeks to reregulate airline industry pricing and service provisions, which were successfully deregulated in 1978. Consumers have benefited from airline deregulation as flying is more affordable and accessible today than it ever has been, and A4A is projecting a record number of people will fly this spring. Regulations proposed in the Senate bill under the cloak of consumer protection have the potential to drive up the cost of air travel for consumers and potentially harm service to small- and medium-sized communities.

“We urge the Senate Commerce Committee to reconsider its approach and instead support provisions that will help provide a rational tax and regulatory framework that will benefit all stakeholders of the aviation system, including the 2 million people who fly on U.S. airlines every day,” said A4A President and CEO Nicholas E. Calio (pictured). “It’s disconcerting at a time when other countries rightly view their airlines as national assets and drivers of the economy and jobs that we are taking steps backward toward reregulation, which will make it more difficult for consumers to afford to fly.”

Calio noted however, that if the Senate’s goal was to improve flying, it would move forward with air traffic control reform.

“The Senate has a historic opportunity to reclaim the United States’ position as a leader in aviation technology and innovation by delivering the transformational ATC reform that airline customers deserve,” Calio said, noting that according to the FAA delays and lost productivity cost our economy $30 billion annually.

Multiple government reports and investigations have identified problems with the current air traffic control system, including failure to advance NextGen technology and meet air traffic controller hiring requirements. Addressing the funding and governance challenges the FAA faces with a separate not-for-profit entity would create stability in long-term planning and hiring, and would aid in continuous technology upgrades and ensure safety remains the top priority within the FAA’s oversight.

"Travelers, shippers and the U.S. economy have everything to gain from modernizing our nation’s antiquated ATC system,” said Calio. “Instead of seizing a historic opportunity to make flying better for the constituents they represent, this legislation embraces a status quo that has not worked, is not working, and is not capable of supporting such a critical driver of our economy in the future.”

The Senate bill, like its House counterpart, rightly rejects calls from the airport community to more than double the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC), also known as the airport tax. On behalf of the flying public who pay the PFC every time they fly, airlines oppose increasing the PFC, noting that collections reached $3 billion in 2015, the highest level in the history of the PFC program. According to FAA reports, U.S. airports brought in over $24 billion in 2013 alone, a 52 percent per-passenger increase from 2000, including record highs of $10 billion from airline rents and fees and $8.2 billion from non-airline revenues such as retail and food and beverage. Additionally, FAA reports show U.S. airports have over $11.4 billion of unrestricted cash and investments on hand and an uncommitted balance of nearly $6 billion in the Airport and Airway Trust Fund, which is the highest level since 2001.

“Airlines support infrastructure, and have invested more than $70 billion in airport projects over the last eight years. There is no lack of resources for airport improvements, and no need to further burden the traveling public with an even higher airport tax,” Calio said. “We commend Chairman Thune for his recognition that there is simply no justification for an increase in the airport tax, and we urge members of the committee to follow his lead in holding the line against unnecessary tax hikes.”

(Source: A4A news release)

FMI: www.airlines.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC