Missouri Auditor Says State Highway Patrol Can't Justify New Airplane | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Thu, Jun 27, 2013

Missouri Auditor Says State Highway Patrol Can't Justify New Airplane

MSHP Spent $5.6 Million On A New King Air

In an audit released Tuesday, the Missouri State Auditor said that the Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) did not do its due diligence before spending $5.6 million to acquire a new airplane for its fleet.

In a news release, Auditor Tom Schweich said the MSHP did not perform a formal written analysis to justify the need to purchase an additional airplane, or to purchase a new airplane instead of a much less expensive used airplane. Although the State of Missouri already operated 23 aircraft, including five passenger planes used primarily for employee transportation, the MSHP spent $5.6 million to purchase a new passenger airplane on Dec. 17, 2012.

Usage records indicate the state was underutilizing its existing airplanes before the latest purchase. In 2012, there were 159 days on which neither pressurized airplane flew and 113 days on which none of the state's 5 passenger planes flew. Conducting a cost/benefit analysis before purchasing new or used airplanes would help the MSHP ensure the cost effectiveness of future purchases.

The Kansas City Star reports that, in a statement, the MSHP defended the purchase of the 2012 King Air 250, saying "multiple factors were taken into consideration" and that a "thorough analysis of needs and usage" was conducted before entering into the agreement to buy the plane, which it said it bought for a "reduced price" of $5.59 million. The Patrol said the King Air is "significantly different" from the other aircraft in the fleet, and that "After careful consideration of all aspects, and evaluating the costs and benefits involved with each, the Patrol concluded that the purchase of this airplane would provide the best investment.”

(King Air 250 pictured in file photo)

FMI: Auditors Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.30.24)

Aero Linx: Malibu M-Class Owners and Pilots Association (MMOPA) The Piper M-Class Owners & Pilots Association (PMOPA) is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the interest>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC